Maher Riley E, Klemballa David M, Walther Sebastian, Mittal Vijay A, Shankman Stewart A, Letkiewicz Allison M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA.
Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2025;47(4):74. doi: 10.1007/s10862-025-10249-1. Epub 2025 Sep 22.
Psychomotor retardation (PmR) is a clinically important but understudied feature of depression. Available studies of PmR in depression have also been limited by the reliance on self-report and observation. Instrumental measures, which have been used to assess motor symptoms in neurological disorders, exhibit greater precision and sensitivity than self-report measures and can provide vital information in the clinical presentation. Hence, the present study sought to examine (a) whether depression (diagnosis and/or symptoms) is abnormally associated with an instrumental-based indictaor of PmR, velocity scaling (VS), a behavioral metric that reflects the ability to increase rate of movement across longer versus shorter distances, and (b) the reliability (internal consistency) of VS. A large sample of healthy controls ( = 85) and those with lifetime MDD ( = 146), completed a handwriting task on a tablet. VS was quantified as a slope of change in velocity from 1 to 4 cm hand-drawn loops, with steeper slopes indicating less PmR. Whereas VS did not differ between groups, lower VS was significantly negatively related to greater anhedonia across participants, even after covarying for overall depression severity. VS scores also exhibited excellent internal consistency. The handwriting task is a reliable and brief measure that can be completed in only a few minutes and could be a feasible way to assess for PmR in clinical settings. Future studies are needed to determine the temporal relation between VS and anhedonia.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10862-025-10249-1.
精神运动迟缓(PmR)是抑郁症临床上一个重要但研究不足的特征。现有的关于抑郁症中PmR的研究也受到对自我报告和观察的依赖的限制。用于评估神经系统疾病运动症状的仪器测量方法,比自我报告测量方法具有更高的精度和敏感性,并且可以在临床表现中提供重要信息。因此,本研究旨在检验:(a)抑郁症(诊断和/或症状)是否与基于仪器的PmR指标速度缩放(VS)异常相关,VS是一种行为指标,反映了在较长距离与较短距离上增加运动速度的能力;以及(b)VS的可靠性(内部一致性)。一大组健康对照者(n = 85)和终生患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者(n = 146)在平板电脑上完成了一项手写任务。VS被量化为从1到4厘米手绘环的速度变化斜率,斜率越陡表明PmR越少。虽然两组之间的VS没有差异,但即使在对总体抑郁严重程度进行协变量调整后,较低的VS与参与者中更大程度的快感缺失显著负相关。VS评分也表现出极好的内部一致性。手写任务是一种可靠且简短的测量方法,只需几分钟即可完成,并且可能是在临床环境中评估PmR的一种可行方法。未来需要进行研究以确定VS与快感缺失之间的时间关系。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10862-025-10249-1获取的补充材料。