Rašková Michaela, Dorčák Vlastimil, Vacek Jan, Šebela Marek
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
J Mass Spectrom. 2025 Oct;60(10):e5181. doi: 10.1002/jms.5181.
Living cells are frequently exposed to aldehydes, as these compounds are produced during metabolism, found in natural dietary sources, and present as contaminants, drugs, and pollutants. For instance, acrolein is well-known as a toxic pollutant, but is also produced in the metabolism of polyamines, threonine, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Another aldehyde, 3-aminopropanal, is a byproduct of polyamine oxidation, and its cytotoxicity has been implicated in various diseases, especially those involving oxidative stress and cellular damage. 3-Aminopropanal can readily convert to acrolein through ammonia elimination. Our objective was to compare the reactivity of these two compounds toward biomolecules. Amino acids such as cysteine and lysine, along with model peptides and proteins, were reacted with an excess of each compound. The reacted molecules were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to assess the extent of modification by examining the difference in molecular mass. Modified peptides, including those obtained by enzymatic digestion of the reacted model proteins, were subjected to tandem mass spectrometry to identify modification sites and determine the structure of the modified amino acids. The most characteristic modifications were Michael addition to cysteine and Schiff base formation with lysine, consistent with known acrolein-induced protein modifications. Compared to acrolein, 3-aminopropanal exhibited substantially reduced reactivity, though it generally targeted the same sites. These results represent the first experimental characterization of 3-aminopropanal-induced protein modifications at the molecular level, and support the notion that 3-aminopropanal is converted to acrolein, which acts as the modifying agent.
活细胞经常暴露于醛类物质中,因为这些化合物在新陈代谢过程中产生,存在于天然饮食来源中,并且作为污染物、药物和污染物出现。例如,丙烯醛是一种众所周知的有毒污染物,但也在多胺、苏氨酸和多不饱和脂肪酸的新陈代谢中产生。另一种醛,3-氨基丙醛,是多胺氧化的副产物,其细胞毒性与多种疾病有关,尤其是那些涉及氧化应激和细胞损伤的疾病。3-氨基丙醛可以通过消除氨很容易地转化为丙烯醛。我们的目标是比较这两种化合物对生物分子的反应性。将半胱氨酸和赖氨酸等氨基酸以及模型肽和蛋白质与每种化合物的过量物反应。通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法分析反应后的分子,通过检查分子量的差异来评估修饰程度。对修饰的肽,包括通过酶消化反应后的模型蛋白获得的肽,进行串联质谱分析,以鉴定修饰位点并确定修饰氨基酸的结构。最典型的修饰是对半胱氨酸的迈克尔加成和与赖氨酸形成席夫碱,这与已知的丙烯醛诱导的蛋白质修饰一致。与丙烯醛相比,3-氨基丙醛的反应性显著降低,尽管它通常靶向相同的位点。这些结果代表了在分子水平上对3-氨基丙醛诱导的蛋白质修饰的首次实验表征,并支持3-氨基丙醛转化为丙烯醛作为修饰剂的观点。