Van Gestel Raf, Shaikh Mujaheed, Vermijs Flore, Riumallo-Herl Carlos
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven, Belgium.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Sep 22;3(2):e001743. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001743. eCollection 2025.
Childhood immunisation coverage has stagnated globally and even declined in some countries during recent decades. We aimed to evaluate whether a public health programme targeted at diarrhoeal disease also impacted, as a spillover effect from the programme, immunisation coverage.
Retrospective data from the 2015/2016 Indian Demographic Health Survey were obtained on 142 921 children, born to mothers in the 5 years leading up to the survey. A difference-in-differences study was performed to compare the completed child vaccination rates before and after the Clinton Health Access Initiative Zinc (CHAI)/Oral Rehydration Salts Programme in 2012, and between covered (Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh) and non-covered states.
The CHAI programme was associated with an increase in basic child vaccination coverage (one dose of BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) and measles, and three doses of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and polio vaccines) of 5.27 percentage points (95% CI 3.48 to 7.05). This increase was concentrated among male children, and no differences were found by wealth quintiles, maternal education or sanitation. Different intensities of the CHAI initiative across districts in Uttar Pradesh were not associated with different vaccination coverage rates.
Existing studies rarely evaluate spillover effects or unintended consequences of public health campaigns. We find that a public health programme to reduce diarrhoeal diseases vaccination coverage in India. These findings highlight the potential horizontal health effects of disease-specific public campaigns and household behaviour responses to the programme. The evidence shows that actionable approaches to improve immunisation coverage exist that do not exclusively rely on vaccination campaigns.
近几十年来,全球儿童免疫接种覆盖率停滞不前,在一些国家甚至有所下降。我们旨在评估一项针对腹泻病的公共卫生项目,作为该项目的溢出效应,是否也对免疫接种覆盖率产生了影响。
从2015/2016年印度人口健康调查中获取了142921名儿童的回顾性数据,这些儿童的母亲是在调查前5年内生育的。采用双重差分法研究,比较2012年克林顿健康获取倡议锌(CHAI)/口服补液盐项目实施前后,以及覆盖地区(中央邦和北方邦)和未覆盖地区的儿童全程疫苗接种率。
CHAI项目使儿童基本疫苗接种覆盖率(一剂卡介苗、一剂麻疹疫苗、三剂百白破疫苗和三剂脊髓灰质炎疫苗)提高了5.27个百分点(95%置信区间为3.48至7.05)。这一增长集中在男童中,在财富五分位数、母亲教育程度或卫生条件方面未发现差异。北方邦各地区CHAI倡议的不同强度与不同的疫苗接种覆盖率无关。
现有研究很少评估公共卫生运动的溢出效应或意外后果。我们发现,一项减少腹泻病的公共卫生项目提高了印度的疫苗接种覆盖率。这些发现凸显了特定疾病公共运动的潜在横向健康影响以及家庭对该项目的行为反应。证据表明,存在一些可行的方法来提高免疫接种覆盖率,而不仅仅依赖于疫苗接种运动。