Andersen Nicole J, Bergeron Catherine, Turcotte Robert, Körner Annett
Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Dec;132(7):1288-1295. doi: 10.1002/jso.70101. Epub 2025 Sep 26.
It is increasingly apparent that the most used patient-reported outcome measure in health-related quality of life (HRQL) soft-tissue sarcoma research (Toronto Extremity Salvage Score) is limited by its exclusive focus on physical function. It is now recommended that it only be used in combination with other global outcome measures, such as the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) and Euroqol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L). We assessed the measurement properties of the RNLI and EQ-5D using the Wilson-Cleary Model and sought to better understand health perceptions and HRQL at 12 months post-op.
Data for this secondary analysis were drawn from an inception cohort of people receiving care for soft-tissue sarcoma at our institution. Inclusion criteria were being ≥ 18 years old and a diagnosis of localized soft-tissue sarcoma (biopsy-confirmed). Measures included the MSTS-87 (pain), RNLI (health perceptions), and EQ-5D-3L (HRQL). RStudio was used to calculate descriptive statistics, assess internal consistency, and evaluate the measurement and structural models.
The study sample (n = 276) was 45% female with a mean age of 56 (18). Internal consistency was high with the RNLI (α = 0.91) and acceptable with EQ-5D-3L (α = 0.74). Findings suggested good model fit with the measurement model (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.37, SRMR = 0.0) and structural model (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.37, SRMR = 0.08). Moreover, HRQL appeared most impacted by the ability to engage in daily activities (work/study, home maintenance, family affairs, and leisure).
The RNLI (health perceptions) and EQ-5D (HRQL) appeared to be reliable and valid with this patient group. Findings suggest targets for optimizing soft-tissue sarcoma outcomes are maximizing functional restoration, encouraging participation in fulfilling activities throughout recovery (even if adapted), and routine psychosocial distress monitoring.
在健康相关生活质量(HRQL)软组织肉瘤研究中,最常用的患者报告结局指标(多伦多肢体挽救评分)越来越明显地受到其对身体功能的排他性关注的限制。现在建议仅将其与其他整体结局指标结合使用,例如重新融入正常生活指数(RNLI)和欧洲五维度健康量表-3L(EQ-5D-3L)。我们使用威尔逊-克利里模型评估了RNLI和EQ-5D的测量属性,并试图更好地了解术后12个月时的健康认知和HRQL。
本次二次分析的数据来自于在我们机构接受软组织肉瘤治疗的初始队列人群。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁且诊断为局限性软组织肉瘤(活检确诊)。测量指标包括MSTS-87(疼痛)、RNLI(健康认知)和EQ-5D-3L(HRQL)。使用RStudio计算描述性统计量、评估内部一致性,并评估测量模型和结构模型。
研究样本(n = 276)中45%为女性,平均年龄为56岁(18岁)。RNLI的内部一致性较高(α = 0.91),EQ-5D-3L的内部一致性可接受(α = 0.74)。结果表明测量模型(CFI = 0.98,RMSEA = 0.37,SRMR = 0.0)和结构模型(CFI = 0.98,RMSEA = 0.37,SRMR = 0.08)拟合良好。此外,HRQL似乎受参与日常活动(工作/学习、家庭维护、家庭事务和休闲)能力的影响最大。
RNLI(健康认知)和EQ-5D(HRQL)在该患者群体中似乎是可靠且有效的。研究结果表明,优化软组织肉瘤结局的目标是最大限度地恢复功能、鼓励在整个康复过程中参与有意义的活动(即使是适应性活动)以及常规监测心理社会困扰。