Imataki Osamu, Uemura Makiko, Kitanaka Akira
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki 701-0192, Japan.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, General Medical Center, Okayama 700-8505, Japan.
J Pers Med. 2025 Sep 5;15(9):429. doi: 10.3390/jpm15090429.
At onset, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may be complicated by coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), infection, thromboembolism, hemophagocytic syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HPS/HLH), hemorrhage, and hematoma formation. In these cases, the cause may be secondary. On the other hand, it is known that platelet clotting dysfunction and fibrinolysis abnormalities are seen in the background of MDS, and primary fibrinolysis abnormalities may be complicated by adverse events associated with paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS). Coagulation fibrinolysis, as a PNS associated with MDS, is known to take the pattern of either consumptive coagulation abnormality or fibrinolytic coagulation abnormality. One mechanism of coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities has been shown to be the immunophenotypical pathway, and aberrant cytokine production is also associated with coagulopathy in MDS. We focused on how to differentiate an MDS-associated bleeding tendency resulting from either secondary or primary causes. In order to make this differentiation, we proposed a useful flowchart for the differentiation of solidified fibrinolysis seen at the initial MDS diagnosis. Additionally, we compared and summarized the molecular pathways of the secondary and primary causes of coagulopathy. Addressing coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities in MDS is required to differentiate the complexity and heterogeneity of bleeding and coagulation abnormalities. This review highlights the need to distinguish between the primary (disease-intrinsic) and secondary (reactive or complication-related) causes of coagulopathy. By proposing a diagnostic flowchart tailored to evaluate these causes at initial diagnosis, this study supports individualized risk stratification and management strategies. By comparing the molecular pathways of the two causes of coagulopathy, we provide a clinical discussion of the underlying pathologies. This aligns with the principles of personalized medicine by ensuring that treatment decisions (e.g., supportive care, anticoagulation, and antifibrinolytics) are based on the patient's specific pathophysiological profile, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
在发病初期,骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)可能并发凝血和纤维蛋白溶解异常,如弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)、肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)、感染、血栓栓塞、噬血细胞综合征/噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症(HPS/HLH)、出血和血肿形成。在这些情况下,病因可能是继发性的。另一方面,已知在MDS背景下会出现血小板凝血功能障碍和纤维蛋白溶解异常,原发性纤维蛋白溶解异常可能并发副肿瘤综合征(PNS)相关的不良事件。作为与MDS相关的PNS,凝血纤维蛋白溶解已知呈现消耗性凝血异常或纤维蛋白溶解性凝血异常的模式。凝血和纤维蛋白溶解异常的一种机制已被证明是免疫表型途径,异常的细胞因子产生也与MDS中的凝血病相关。我们重点关注如何区分由继发性或原发性原因导致的MDS相关出血倾向。为了进行这种区分,我们提出了一个有用的流程图,用于区分在MDS初始诊断时出现的凝固性纤维蛋白溶解。此外,我们比较并总结了凝血病继发性和原发性原因的分子途径。解决MDS中的凝血和纤维蛋白溶解异常对于区分出血和凝血异常的复杂性和异质性是必要的。本综述强调了区分凝血病原发性(疾病内在性)和继发性(反应性或并发症相关性)原因的必要性。通过提出一个在初始诊断时评估这些原因的诊断流程图,本研究支持个体化风险分层和管理策略。通过比较凝血病两种原因的分子途径,我们对潜在病理进行了临床讨论。这符合个性化医疗的原则,确保治疗决策(如支持性治疗、抗凝和抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗)基于患者的特定病理生理特征,而不是一刀切的方法。