Dani Carlo, Sarcina Davide, Corsini Iuri, Pratesi Simone, Poggi Chiara, Montano Simona, Loi Barbara, Regiroli Giulia, De Luca Daniele
Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Italy.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Sep 26;184(10):639. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06485-y.
There is no consensus regarding the timing and diagnostic criteria for identifying hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA). Our aim was to evaluate if the use of different diagnostic criteria at different times could be associated with a different incidence of hsPDA in very preterm infants. We studied 41 infants with gestational age < 32 weeks born in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Florence, Italy, or in Paris, France. They received the first echocardiography between 24 and 48 h of life and the second between 72 and 84 h to diagnose hsPDA using Florence and Paris criteria and PDA severity score. Concordance of diagnosis between criteria was evaluated with the Cohen unweighted κ statistic. The incidence of hsPDA diagnosed by the Florence (35%) or Paris (34%) criteria or by PDA severity score (35%) was similar. Concordance was substantial between Florence and Paris criteria and between Florence criteria and PDA severity score but was fair between Paris criteria and PDA severity score. Moreover, concordance significantly changed from the first to the second echocardiography. Conclusion: The studied diagnostic criteria showed important variations of concordance when applied at different times. This led to diagnose hsPDA in different patients at different times while leaving the overall percentage of hsPDA unchanged. Our results suggest that more attention should be paid to the choice of diagnostic criteria for individuating hsPDA in very preterm infants. What is Known: • There is no consensus regarding the timing and diagnostic criteria for individuating hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) in preterm infant. • This implies large variations in its frequency and management diagnosis between centers. What is New: • This study evaluated for the first time how different diagnostic criteria used at different postnatal times may influence the diagnosis of hsPDA in very preterm infants.
关于识别血流动力学显著的动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)的时机和诊断标准,目前尚无共识。我们的目的是评估在不同时间使用不同的诊断标准是否会与极早产儿hsPDA的不同发生率相关。我们研究了41例胎龄<32周的婴儿,这些婴儿在意大利佛罗伦萨或法国巴黎的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)出生。他们在出生后24至48小时接受了首次超声心动图检查,并在72至84小时接受了第二次检查,以使用佛罗伦萨和巴黎标准以及动脉导管未闭严重程度评分来诊断hsPDA。使用Cohen未加权κ统计量评估标准之间诊断的一致性。通过佛罗伦萨标准(35%)、巴黎标准(34%)或动脉导管未闭严重程度评分(35%)诊断的hsPDA发生率相似。佛罗伦萨标准和巴黎标准之间以及佛罗伦萨标准和动脉导管未闭严重程度评分之间的一致性很高,但巴黎标准和动脉导管未闭严重程度评分之间的一致性一般。此外,从第一次到第二次超声心动图检查,一致性有显著变化。结论:所研究的诊断标准在不同时间应用时显示出重要的一致性差异。这导致在不同时间对不同患者诊断出hsPDA,而hsPDA的总体百分比保持不变。我们的结果表明,在极早产儿中识别hsPDA时,应更加关注诊断标准的选择。已知信息:• 关于识别早产儿血流动力学显著的动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)的时机和诊断标准尚无共识。• 这意味着各中心在其频率和管理诊断方面存在很大差异。新发现:• 本研究首次评估了出生后不同时间使用不同诊断标准如何影响极早产儿hsPDA的诊断。