• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对不同餐具材料的感官和情感反应。

The Sensory and Emotional Response to Different Tableware Materials.

作者信息

Pantović Ana, Djekić Ilija, Petrović Tanja, Tomić Nikola

机构信息

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 Sep 9;14(18):3151. doi: 10.3390/foods14183151.

DOI:10.3390/foods14183151
PMID:41008124
Abstract

The high environmental impact caused by the accumulation of single-use plastic calls for measures to curb this problem, from a ban on single-use plastic tableware to the production of a wide range of biodegradable and reusable products. The aim of this study was to investigate how tableware made of different materials affects consumers' sensory perception and emotional and hedonic responses when eating the same meal. In this study, four types of meals of animal or plant origin were selected for the experiments, which were served warm or cold. Accordingly, four groups of university students were instructed to taste the corresponding meal while using three sets of tableware made of different materials: polypropylene, wood/cardboard, and a stainless steel/ceramic/glass control set (regular set). Overall, the results suggest that the use of regular tableware elicited a positive emotional profile, while the use of disposable, wooden, and plastic tableware elicited negative emotional responses, which is consistent with the acceptability of the meal samples-regular tableware received higher ratings, while both types of disposable tableware received lower ratings. Finally, the material of the tableware only led to changes in odor and flavor perception when warm-served meals were sampled-higher intensities were reported when students used the regular tableware sets. Wooden cutlery imparted an atypical woody flavor to the meals, regardless of the type of meal.

摘要

一次性塑料的堆积造成了巨大的环境影响,这就需要采取措施来遏制这一问题,从禁止使用一次性塑料餐具到生产各种可生物降解和可重复使用的产品。本研究的目的是调查不同材料制成的餐具在食用同一餐时如何影响消费者的感官感知、情感和享乐反应。在本研究中,选择了四种动物或植物来源的餐食进行实验,餐食分为热食或冷食。相应地,四组大学生被要求在使用三组不同材料制成的餐具品尝相应餐食时进行实验:聚丙烯、木材/纸板,以及不锈钢/陶瓷/玻璃对照组(常规组)。总体而言,结果表明,使用常规餐具会引发积极的情绪反应,而使用一次性、木制和塑料餐具会引发消极的情绪反应,这与餐食样本的可接受性一致——常规餐具获得了更高的评分,而两种一次性餐具的评分较低。最后,当品尝热食时,餐具材料只会导致气味和风味感知的变化——学生使用常规餐具组时报告的强度更高。木制餐具会给餐食带来一种非典型的木质风味,无论餐食类型如何。

相似文献

1
The Sensory and Emotional Response to Different Tableware Materials.对不同餐具材料的感官和情感反应。
Foods. 2025 Sep 9;14(18):3151. doi: 10.3390/foods14183151.
2
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
3
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
6
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚青年男女的避孕决策:定性研究结果。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood.人体血液中塑料颗粒污染的发现与量化
Environ Int. 2022 May;163:107199. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Comparing Meal Satisfaction Based on Different Types of Tableware: An Experimental Study of Japanese Cuisine Culture.基于不同类型餐具的用餐满意度比较:日本饮食文化的实验研究
Foods. 2021 Jul 4;10(7):1546. doi: 10.3390/foods10071546.
3
Environmental Impact of Food Packaging Materials: A Review of Contemporary Development from Conventional Plastics to Polylactic Acid Based Materials.
食品包装材料的环境影响:从传统塑料到聚乳酸基材料的当代发展综述
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 6;13(21):4994. doi: 10.3390/ma13214994.
4
Quantifying impacts of plastic debris on marine wildlife identifies ecological breakpoints.量化塑料碎片对海洋野生动物的影响可确定生态临界点。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Oct;23(10):1479-1487. doi: 10.1111/ele.13574. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Corporate social responsibility in marine plastic debris governance.海洋塑料垃圾治理中的企业社会责任。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Feb;127:310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.054. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
Touch-flavor transference: Assessing the effect of packaging weight on gustatory evaluations, desire for food and beverages, and willingness to pay.触觉-风味转移:评估包装重量对味觉评价、食品和饮料的渴望程度以及支付意愿的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0186121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186121. eCollection 2017.
7
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made.所有塑料制品的生产、使用及去向。
Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 19;3(7):e1700782. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
The effect of packaging, branding and labeling on the experience of unhealthy food and drink: A review.包装、品牌塑造和标签对不健康食品和饮料体验的影响:一项综述。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:219-234. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
9
Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965-1966 to 2007-2008.美国家庭食品制备和消费趋势:1965-1966 年至 2007-2008 年全国营养调查和时间利用研究分析。
Nutr J. 2013 Apr 11;12:45. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-45.
10
Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):235-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193836.