• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国疫情后公众信任度的激增

Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Rose John, Reid Jason, Morton Lisa, Stomberg-Firestein Sasha, Miller Lisa

机构信息

Spirituality Mind Body Institute & Clinical Psychology Program, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Sep 1;15(9):1193. doi: 10.3390/bs15091193.

DOI:10.3390/bs15091193
PMID:41009223
Abstract

Trust in public institutions was challenged during the COVID-19 global pandemic, with widespread mistrust towards healthcare institutions as well as fellow public institutions. Concurrently, a new public institution or social tool, mass-market artificial intelligence (AI), more broadly emerged, which too may be a target of fluctuating public trust. Using national survey data from the United Kingdom's Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (survey year: 2022, N = 4320; survey year: 2023, N = 4232), we explore the level of trust in civic institutions (healthcare, non-healthcare, and AI) during and immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom using a naturalistic quasi-experimental design. At both waves (2022 and 2023), principal component analysis and structural equation modeling over thirteen public institutions and AI variables confirmed three factors (or domains) of public trust: trust in healthcare institutions, trust in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare, and trust in AI. Measurement invariance testing of mean levels of public trust along each distinct component revealed that as compared with 2022, in 2023, (1) trust in healthcare institutions and in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare significantly increased and (2) trust in AI remained approximately level. Next, latent profile modeling revealed four levels of a common public trust profile, with all three domains of public trust being normatively closely associated. Taken together, these results suggest that a psychological stance of public trust, PT, may increase after a societal crisis.

摘要

在新冠疫情全球大流行期间,对公共机构的信任受到了挑战,人们对医疗机构以及其他公共机构普遍不信任。与此同时,一种新的公共机构或社交工具——大众市场人工智能(AI)更广泛地出现了,它也可能成为公众信任波动的对象。利用英国数据伦理与创新中心的全国调查数据(调查年份:2022年,N = 4320;调查年份:2023年,N = 4232),我们采用自然主义准实验设计,探讨了英国在新冠疫情期间及疫情刚结束后对公民机构(医疗、非医疗和人工智能)的信任程度。在两个调查阶段(2022年和2023年),对13个公共机构和人工智能变量进行主成分分析和结构方程建模,确认了公众信任的三个因素(或领域):对医疗机构的信任、对除医疗之外的其他公民机构的信任以及对人工智能的信任。对每个不同组成部分的公众信任平均水平进行测量不变性测试表明,与2022年相比,2023年,(1)对医疗机构和对除医疗之外的其他公民机构的信任显著增加,(2)对人工智能的信任基本保持不变。接下来,潜在剖面建模揭示了公众信任概况的四个水平,公众信任的所有三个领域在规范上密切相关。综上所述,这些结果表明,社会危机过后,公众信任的心理立场(PT)可能会增强。

相似文献

1
Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom.英国疫情后公众信任度的激增
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Sep 1;15(9):1193. doi: 10.3390/bs15091193.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
5
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
8
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes: GILD, a scoping study.糖尿病产妇分娩期间的血糖控制:GILD,一项范围界定研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(41):1-150. doi: 10.3310/KHGD2761.

本文引用的文献

1
Large AI models are cultural and social technologies.大型人工智能模型是文化和社会技术。
Science. 2025 Mar 14;387(6739):1153-1156. doi: 10.1126/science.adt9819. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Trust Building in Public Health Approaches: The Importance of a "People-Centered" Concept in Crisis Response.公共卫生方法中的信任建立:危机应对中“以人为本”理念的重要性。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug 1;17:1903-1908. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S471250. eCollection 2024.
3
The welfare state in really hard times: Political trust and satisfaction with the German healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic.
艰难时期的福利国家:新冠疫情期间德国医疗体系的政治信任与满意度
J Eur Soc Policy. 2022 Oct;32(4):393-406. doi: 10.1177/09589287221085922.
4
Social and political trust diverge during a crisis.社会和政治信任在危机期间出现分歧。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50898-4.
5
Trust toward humans and trust toward artificial intelligence are not associated: Initial insights from self-report and neurostructural brain imaging.对人类的信任与对人工智能的信任并无关联:来自自我报告和神经结构脑成像的初步见解。
Personal Neurosci. 2023 Mar 21;6:e3. doi: 10.1017/pen.2022.5. eCollection 2023.
6
Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): a brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence.人工智能态度量表(AIAS - 4)的开发与验证:一种对人工智能总体态度的简短测量方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 24;14:1191628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628. eCollection 2023.
7
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science.ChatGPT和生成式人工智能对科学意味着什么。
Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7947):214-216. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6.
8
Spiritually grounded character: A latent profile analysis.基于精神基础的性格:一项潜在剖面分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1061416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061416. eCollection 2022.
9
Trust, Governance, and the Covid-19 Pandemic: an Explainer using Longitudinal Data from the United Kingdom.信任、治理与新冠疫情:一项使用英国纵向数据的解读
Polit Q. 2022 Apr-Jun;93(2):316-325. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13131. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
10
Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature.信任与新冠疫情:信任的后果及对信任而言的后果是什么?文献的早期综述
Polit Stud Rev. 2021 May;19(2):274-285. doi: 10.1177/1478929920948684.