Comparative Evaluation of Different Biomass Ashes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials: Reactivity, Hydration Impact and Environmental Considerations.

Biomass ashes are considered to be sustainable alternatives for fly ashes from hard coal combustion for the use as supplementary cementitious material (SCM). However, their diverse composition and properties are impeding their standardized use. This study aims to gain a better understanding of how composition affects performance. It investigates three wood ashes (one bottom ash, two fly ashes), one spelt husk ash and a mineral residue from sewage sludge ash after wet-chemical phosphorus recovery for their suitability as SCM. After characterization of the materials including the determination of environmentally relevant parameters, the reactivity was tested using the R test and mortar compressive strength with different substitution levels. The effect on hydration was studied in blends with Portland cement using isothermal calorimetry and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The composition of the ashes differed significantly, also between the wood ashes. The wood ashes showed no significant reactivity (cumulative R heat lower than 125 J/g SCM after 7 days), while the spelt husk ash and the sewage sludge ash residue showed distinct reactivity with a cumulative R heat of 249 and 181 J/g SCM after 7 days, respectively. Following an initial period of unaffected hydration, the wood fly ashes were found to impede clinker reactivity. In contrast, the other materials exhibited no significant influence on the hydration process, aside from the consumption of portlandite by the reactive ones. The wood fly ashes also impaired strength development in blended mortar formulations (e.g., relative compressive strengths with a cement substitution level of 20 wt% after 28 days were <0.6), whereas the reactive spelt husk ash and the mineral residue were associated with a measurable contribution to strength gain (e.g., relative compressive strengths with a cement substitution level of 20 wt% after 28 days were >0.85). The wood bottom ash was the only material investigated which perfectly sustained mortar workability and rather acts like a nearly inert addition. The results show both the potential and the limitations of using different types of ash, which cannot be generalized due to the wide variation in raw materials and combustion conditions.