Muruti Gopinath, Ahmad Mohd Faizal, Abu Muhammad Azrai, Latif Nurul Ilani Abdul, Karim Abdul Kadir Abdul
Advanced Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(9):1334. doi: 10.3390/life15091334.
Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration remains the gold standard for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technology (ART). This procedure employs either a single-lumen aspiration needle (SLN) or double-lumen aspiration needle (DLN), both of which are effective modalities for oocyte retrieval. The primary objective of this review is to systematically compare the impact and clinical outcomes associated with the use of SLN versus DLN in women undergoing ART. A systematic literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, encompassing publications from their inception until May 2025, and articles published in English. A total of five studies were included in the final analysis. The oocyte yield and the number of MII oocyte did not differ significantly between the groups. Procedural duration was markedly shorter in the SLN group compared to the DLN group. No significant differences were observed in procedure-related complications across groups. Two randomized controlled trials reported comparable fertilization rates and numbers of high-quality embryos between the two needle types. Additionally, clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar between the SLN and DLN groups. In conclusion, the utilization ofan SLN for oocyte retrieval demonstrates comparable efficacy to that of a DLN.
经阴道超声引导下卵泡抽吸术仍是辅助生殖技术(ART)中获取卵母细胞的金标准。该手术采用单腔抽吸针(SLN)或双腔抽吸针(DLN),两者都是获取卵母细胞的有效方式。本综述的主要目的是系统比较在接受ART的女性中使用SLN与DLN的影响和临床结果。在PubMed和谷歌学术这两个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,涵盖从数据库创建到2025年5月的出版物以及以英文发表的文章。最终分析共纳入五项研究。两组之间的卵母细胞产量和MII期卵母细胞数量无显著差异。与DLN组相比,SLN组的手术时间明显更短。各组之间在与手术相关的并发症方面未观察到显著差异。两项随机对照试验报告了两种针型之间可比的受精率和高质量胚胎数量。此外,SLN组和DLN组之间的临床妊娠率、持续妊娠率和活产率相似。总之,使用SLN获取卵母细胞显示出与DLN相当的疗效。