Suppr超能文献

钝性创伤性膈肌损伤的临床指标与影像特征:一项回顾性单中心研究

Clinical Indicators and Imaging Characteristics of Blunt Traumatic Diaphragmatic Injury: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Ryu Hoon, Byun Chun Sung, Kim Sungyup, Bae Keum Seok, Park Il Hwan, Oh Jin Rok, Kang Chan Young, Kim Jun Gi, Choi Young Un

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 18;14(18):6562. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186562.

Abstract

Blunt trauma injury of the diaphragm is uncommon. Even after imaging examination, accurate diagnosis remains difficult. We sought to identify clinical factors that raise suspicion of such injuries, which can be applied during the initial evaluation of trauma patients. We retrospectively analyzed patients with blunt trauma who were diagnosed with diaphragmatic injury between January 2015 and July 2025. Demographic variables, clinical findings, operative records, and imaging findings were reviewed. The most common mechanism of injury in patients with diaphragmatic injury was traffic accidents (64.2%), and 77.4% were identified as severe injuries with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16. Computed tomography (CT) scans of these patients frequently showed hemothorax, hemoperitoneum, and pneumothorax, but 49.1% of cases did not show diaphragmatic injury on preoperative imaging. In these patients, pneumothorax, lower rib fractures, and liver injury were more common. Notably, pneumothorax strongly suggested the possibility of diaphragmatic injury in patients where intrathoracic herniation was not clear. In patients with polytrauma and unstable vital signs, CT evaluation of torso injuries and careful interpretation are essential. Even when CT does not reveal diaphragmatic injury, suspicion should be elevated in cases with high ISS accompanied by pneumothorax, hemoperitoneum, hemothorax, lower rib fractures, or extremity injuries. If the injury mechanism further raises clinical suspicion, repeated physical examinations and imaging studies should be performed. When suspicion remains high, surgical intervention should be considered to confirm the diagnosis.

摘要

膈肌钝性创伤并不常见。即使经过影像学检查,准确诊断仍很困难。我们试图确定在创伤患者的初始评估中可应用的、能提高对此类损伤怀疑度的临床因素。我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2025年7月期间被诊断为膈肌损伤的钝性创伤患者。对人口统计学变量、临床发现、手术记录和影像学发现进行了审查。膈肌损伤患者最常见的损伤机制是交通事故(64.2%),77.4%被确定为重伤,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥16。这些患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)经常显示血胸、血腹和气胸,但49.1%的病例在术前影像学检查中未显示膈肌损伤。在这些患者中,气胸、下肋骨骨折和肝损伤更为常见。值得注意的是,在胸腔内疝不明确的患者中,气胸强烈提示膈肌损伤的可能性。在多发伤且生命体征不稳定的患者中,对躯干损伤进行CT评估并仔细解读至关重要。即使CT未显示膈肌损伤,在ISS高且伴有气胸、血腹、血胸、下肋骨骨折或肢体损伤的情况下,也应提高怀疑度。如果损伤机制进一步引起临床怀疑,应进行重复体格检查和影像学检查。当怀疑度仍然很高时,应考虑手术干预以确诊。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验