Milani Giada, Baroni Andrea, Galluccio Martina, Fregna Giulia, Antonioni Annibale, Straudi Sofia, Pozzo Thierry, Fadiga Luciano
Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Iit@Unife Center for Translational Neurophysiology, Istituto Italiano Di Tecnologia, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 19;14(18):6618. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186618.
: Restoring motor function is crucial for daily life after a stroke. Although patients' engagement and attention influence motor recovery, these factors are frequently overlooked in rehabilitation interventions. : This prospective open-label pilot trial (NCT04622189) investigated the impact of attentional deficits on engagement and motor recovery in 10 subacute stroke patients undergoing a 4-week action observation training program. At baseline, they were divided into two subgroups based on attentional performance, as determined by scores on the Test of Attentional Performance (subtests of divided attention and Go/No-Go): those with attention deficits (AD, i.e., deficits in one or both tasks, n = 6) and those without (No_AD, no deficits in either task, n = 4). : Both groups exhibited similar motor profiles at baseline; however, the AD group presented significantly lower cognitive reserve (AD mean (SD) 92.2 ± 4.09, No_AD 120 ± 14.9, = 0.005) and greater anxiety and depressive symptoms (AD 66.7%, No_AD 0%, = 0.035). While all patients showed improvements in motor outcomes, the No_AD group demonstrated significantly greater gains in upper limb function, as assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (AD 3.33 ± 1.21, No_AD 10.8 ± 5.7, = 0.013). Engagement and accuracy of interactive questions, used as proxies for concentration during training, were also higher in the No_AD group and positively correlated (rho = 0.9075, ≤ 0.001). Moreover, patients with attention deficits reported lower levels of engagement during training. : These findings indicate that attentional status may affect both adherence to and responsiveness to rehabilitation. This highlights a potentially relevant factor to consider when improving post-stroke interventions.
恢复运动功能对中风后的日常生活至关重要。尽管患者的参与度和注意力会影响运动恢复,但在康复干预中这些因素常常被忽视。
这项前瞻性开放标签试点试验(NCT04622189)调查了10名接受为期4周动作观察训练计划的亚急性中风患者注意力缺陷对参与度和运动恢复的影响。在基线时,根据注意力表现将他们分为两个亚组,注意力表现通过注意力表现测试(分心测试和Go/No-Go子测试)的分数来确定:注意力缺陷组(AD,即一项或两项任务存在缺陷,n = 6)和无注意力缺陷组(No_AD,两项任务均无缺陷,n = 4)。
两组在基线时表现出相似的运动特征;然而,AD组的认知储备显著较低(AD组平均值(标准差)92.2±4.09,No_AD组120±14.9,P = 0.005),焦虑和抑郁症状更严重(AD组66.7%,No_AD组0%,P = 0.035)。虽然所有患者的运动结果都有所改善,但根据Fugl-Meyer评估,No_AD组在上肢功能方面的改善明显更大(AD组3.33±1.21,No_AD组10.8±5.7,P = 0.013)。用作训练期间注意力集中指标的互动问题的参与度和准确性在No_AD组中也更高,且呈正相关(rho = 0.9075,P≤0.001)。此外,注意力缺陷患者在训练期间报告的参与度较低。
这些发现表明,注意力状态可能会影响康复的依从性和反应性。这凸显了在改善中风后干预措施时需要考虑的一个潜在相关因素。