Lopez-Aguilera Jose, Perea-Armijo Jorge, Muñoz-Villarreal Ana Belen, Cepas-Sosa Antonia, Luque-Serrano Luisa Maria, Aguayo-Caño Nerea, Heredia-Campos Gloria Maria, Martin-Diaz Juan Diego, Gonzalez-Manzanares Rafael, Castillo-Dominguez Juan Carlos, Crespin-Crespin Manuel, Delgado-Ortega Monica, Ruiz-Ortiz Martin, Mesa-Rubio Dolores, Pan-Alvarez Osorio Manuel, Anguita-Sanchez Manuel
Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department of Reina Sofia University Hospital, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Cordoba Biomedical Research Institute, IMIBIC, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 22;14(18):6681. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186681.
The increasingly active role of nurses in the management of heart failure (HF) has become important in HF units (HCUs). This study aims to determine the effect of opening a specialised HF nursing (NSHF) consultation in a tertiary hospital on drug titration, and its subsequent impact on cardiac remodelling and prognosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who were treated between 2017 and 2020. Patients who were followed by the NSHF were compared with those who underwent conventional clinical follow-up (non-NSHF), focusing on drug optimisation, echocardiographic parameters, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes in terms of mortality and hospital readmissions for HF. A total of 411 patients were analysed, 85 of whom (20.7%) were treated with NSHF. There were hardly any differences in baseline characteristics. At the end of follow-up, the NSHF group had a higher prescription rate of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (+31.7% vs. +23.3%; < 0.001), beta-blockers (+2.4% vs. -5.8%; < 0.001), and sodium glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors (+24.7% vs. +17.8%; < 0.001). There was also a higher rate of loop diuretic withdrawal (-16.7% vs. -6.7%; < 0.001). However, no improvement in reverse remodelling or neurohormonal response was observed. Patients treated with NSHF had a lower probability of dying from HF (88.6% vs. 63.3%; = 0.006), but this did not reduce hospital admissions for HF. Patients with HFrEF who are cared for through NSHF are more likely to be prescribed drugs that modify the prognosis of the disease. This has an impact on their mortality.
护士在心力衰竭(HF)管理中日益积极的作用在心力衰竭病房(HCUs)已变得至关重要。本研究旨在确定在一家三级医院开设专门的心力衰竭护理(NSHF)咨询对药物滴定的影响,以及其随后对心脏重塑和预后的影响。对2017年至2020年期间接受治疗的射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。将接受NSHF随访的患者与接受传统临床随访(非NSHF)的患者进行比较,重点关注药物优化、超声心动图参数、生物标志物以及心力衰竭死亡率和再入院方面的临床结局。共分析了411例患者,其中85例(20.7%)接受了NSHF治疗。基线特征几乎没有差异。随访结束时,NSHF组血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的处方率更高(+31.7%对+23.3%;<0.001),β受体阻滞剂(+2.4%对 -5.8%;<0.001),以及2型钠葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制剂(+24.7%对+17.8%;<0.001)。袢利尿剂停用率也更高(-16.7%对 -6.7%;<0.001)。然而,未观察到逆向重塑或神经激素反应的改善。接受NSHF治疗的患者死于心力衰竭的概率较低(88.6%对63.3%;=0.006),但这并未减少心力衰竭的住院次数。通过NSHF护理的HFrEF患者更有可能被开具改善疾病预后的药物。这对他们的死亡率有影响。