Chen Yi-Shyue, Feng Chi-Yu, Su Shih-Hao, Wang Yu-Han, Yang Ting-Hua, Lin Chih-Feng
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Sep 8;61(9):1620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61091620.
: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) frequently recurs following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), yet reported recurrence rates, risk factors, and treatment responses differ significantly across regions. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on recurrence patterns, predictive models, and treatment strategies, with a focus on comparing Asian and Western populations. : A structured narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to June 2025. A total of 116 studies were included based on predefined criteria regarding recurrence definitions, risk factors, prediction models, and postoperative management. : Recurrence rates ranged from 12% to 76.6%, with wide variability attributed to differences in follow-up duration and recurrence definitions. Key risk factors included tissue eosinophilia, comorbid asthma, and type 2 inflammation. Asian predictive models emphasized inflammatory biomarkers such as tissue and blood eosinophils, whereas Western models incorporated imaging, prior surgical history, and symptom burden. While biologics are widely used in the West, their adoption remains limited in Asia, where endotype-driven corticosteroid strategies are predominant. : CRS recurrence after ESS is influenced by inflammatory endotypes, comorbidities, and regional treatment paradigms. Cross-regional differences in immune profiles and healthcare access necessitate the development of standardized definitions and validated, endotype-driven prediction tools. Tailored treatment strategies, especially for non-type 2 CRS, are essential to achieving equitable and effective care globally.
慢性鼻 - 鼻窦炎(CRS)在内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)后经常复发,但不同地区报告的复发率、危险因素和治疗反应差异显著。本综述旨在综合当前关于复发模式、预测模型和治疗策略的证据,重点比较亚洲和西方人群。
通过检索2010年1月至2025年6月的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了结构化叙述性综述。根据关于复发定义、危险因素、预测模型和术后管理的预定义标准,共纳入116项研究。
复发率在12%至76.6%之间,由于随访时间和复发定义的差异,存在很大的变异性。关键危险因素包括组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多、合并哮喘和2型炎症。亚洲的预测模型强调炎症生物标志物,如组织和血液嗜酸性粒细胞,而西方模型则纳入了影像学、既往手术史和症状负担。虽然生物制剂在西方广泛使用,但在亚洲的应用仍然有限,在亚洲,以内型为驱动的皮质类固醇策略占主导地位。
ESS后CRS复发受炎症内型、合并症和区域治疗模式的影响。免疫特征和医疗服务可及性的跨区域差异需要制定标准化定义和经过验证的、以内型为驱动的预测工具。量身定制的治疗策略,特别是对于非2型CRS,对于在全球范围内实现公平有效的治疗至关重要。