Suppr超能文献

实验室内外发散性思维、执行控制能力及走神现象的差异

Variation in Divergent Thinking, Executive-Control Abilities, and Mind-Wandering Measured In and Out of the Laboratory.

作者信息

Rodriguez-Boerwinkle Rebekah M, Welhaf Matthew S, Smeekens Bridget A, Booth Rachel A, Kwapil Thomas R, Silvia Paul J, Kane Michael J

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Creat Res J. 2024 Mar 26. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2326336.

Abstract

Individual differences in executive functions (or executive control abilities) predict variation in creative thinking ability. Relatedly, propensity for mind-wandering-or task unrelated thought-has been gaining attention among creativity scholars, but its effects on creativity remain unclear. The present study conceptually replicates and extends recent laboratory and experience-sampling work to assess the links between individual differences in divergent thinking, executive control abilities (working memory capacity and attention control), and measures of mind-wandering collected in both contexts. SEM analyses indicated that executive control factors weakly predicted divergent thinking scores, mainly due to their role in filtering out uncreative ideas rather than generating highly novel ones. Lab-based measures of mind-wandering didn't significantly correlate with overall creative thinking, challenging the idea that mind-wandering uniformly enhances creativity, but they were positively linked to highly creative divergent thinking scores. Daily-life measures of mind-wandering, meanwhile, did not provide stronger predictive insights into creative thinking than lab measures. Finally, exploratory analyses found that divergent thinking scores based on highly creative responses were positively associated with episodes of more fantastical, unrealistic mind-wandering, or "daydreaming." We end our investigation with a call for greater theoretical precision and some hypotheses to guide future work. [Data, scripts, and preprint: https://osf.io/at5gx/].

摘要

执行功能(或执行控制能力)的个体差异可预测创造性思维能力的变化。与此相关的是,走神倾向——即与任务无关的思维——在创造力学者中越来越受到关注,但其对创造力的影响仍不明确。本研究从概念上重复并扩展了最近的实验室研究和经验抽样研究,以评估发散性思维的个体差异、执行控制能力(工作记忆容量和注意力控制)以及在这两种情况下收集的走神测量指标之间的联系。结构方程模型分析表明,执行控制因素对发散性思维分数的预测作用较弱,主要是因为它们在过滤掉无创造性的想法而非产生高度新颖的想法方面所起的作用。基于实验室的走神测量指标与整体创造性思维没有显著相关性,这对走神能统一提高创造力的观点提出了挑战,但它们与高度创造性的发散性思维分数呈正相关。与此同时,日常生活中的走神测量指标对创造性思维的预测洞察力并不比实验室测量指标更强。最后,探索性分析发现,基于高度创造性反应的发散性思维分数与更奇幻、不现实的走神或“白日梦”情节呈正相关。我们以呼吁提高理论精确性和提出一些指导未来工作的假设来结束我们的调查。[数据、脚本和预印本:https://osf.io/at5gx/]

引用本文的文献

1

本文引用的文献

1
Associative thinking at the core of creativity.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul;27(7):671-683. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Fixation, flexibility, and creativity: The dynamics of mind wandering.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Jul;48(7):689-710. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001012. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Propensity or diversity? Investigating how mind wandering influences the incubation effect of creativity.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 29;17(4):e0267187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267187. eCollection 2022.
4
Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: a state-of-the-art review.
Cogn Process. 2022 Aug;23(3):341-366. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
5
Updating the dynamic framework of thought: Creativity and psychedelics.
Neuroimage. 2020 Jun;213:116726. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116726. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
6
Individual differences in creative cognition.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jul;149(7):1249-1274. doi: 10.1037/xge0000713. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Enhancing Attentional Control: Lessons from Action Video Games.
Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.031.
8
Old problems in new contexts: The context-dependent fixation hypothesis.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):192-197. doi: 10.1037/xge0000615. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
A Semantic Network Cartography of the Creative Mind.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;23(4):271-274. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
10
When the Muses Strike: Creative Ideas of Physicists and Writers Routinely Occur During Mind Wandering.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):396-404. doi: 10.1177/0956797618820626. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验