Hwalla Nahla, Trichopoulou Antonia, Delarue Jacques, Adinolfi Felice, Brighenti Furio, Burlingame Barbara, Capone Roberto, Dernini Sandro, El Moujabber Maroun, González-Gross Marcela, Vecchio Yari, Massouh Nour, Naja Farah
Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Front Nutr. 2025 Sep 12;12:1533176. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1533176. eCollection 2025.
A plethora of studies has documented the benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) for both human and environmental health. At the core of these investigations lies the assessment of adherence to it. In this manuscript, we aim to examine existing original scores used to assess adherence to the MedDiet and propose a framework for a unified score to address current challenges and complement the existing scores. A literature search was conducted to identify original MED scores, excluding those derived from earlier scores. A total of nineteen original scores were identified and examined. At the conceptual level, across existing scores, the following issues were identified: inconsistencies in food items, lack of holistic lifestyle approaches with focus on food-based components, limited cultural specificity, absence of sustainability evaluations, and regional focus solely on economically developed countries. At the methodological level, the majority of scores were based on cutoffs set by the population-specific distributions of dietary intake. Such cutoffs may be in discordance with the dietary recommendations of the different food groups considered. In addition, the definition of "adherence" is inconsistent across the scores, making the interpretation and comparability of the prevalence of adherence another methodological challenge. As a result, a framework for a Unified Mediterranean diet Score (UMEDS) is proposed. This framework consists of 10 food groups (whole grains, fruits, vegetables, dairy products, fish, legumes, olive oil, nuts and seeds, poultry, and red meat). These food groups are the common denominators of a traditional Mediterranean diet. In addition to the food-related components, the UMEDS also addresses physical activity, sleep, conviviality, and culture-specific food consumption (mainly composite dishes based on olive oil). For each of these items, evidence-based cut-offs were proposed. The total score for the UMEDS ranges from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating a higher adherence (≤12 poor adherence, 13-17 moderate adherence, ≥18 good adherence). By integrating key components of dietary intake, lifestyle habits, and cultural practices, the UMEDS provides a comprehensive unified approach that aligns with global health guidelines and reflects the true spirit of the Mediterranean diet, rooted in food, lifestyle, culture, lifestyle, and traditional knowledge and practices.
大量研究记录了地中海饮食(MedDiet)对人类健康和环境健康的益处。这些研究的核心在于对遵循地中海饮食情况的评估。在本论文中,我们旨在审视用于评估遵循地中海饮食情况的现有原始评分,并提出一个统一评分框架,以应对当前挑战并补充现有评分。我们进行了文献检索,以识别原始的地中海饮食评分,排除那些从早期评分衍生而来的评分。共识别并审查了19个原始评分。在概念层面,在现有评分中发现了以下问题:食物项目不一致、缺乏以食物为基础成分的整体生活方式方法、文化特异性有限、缺乏可持续性评估以及仅关注经济发达国家的地区性情况。在方法层面,大多数评分基于饮食摄入量的特定人群分布设定的临界值。这样的临界值可能与所考虑的不同食物组的饮食建议不一致。此外,“遵循”的定义在各个评分中不一致,这使得遵循率的解释和可比性成为另一个方法学挑战。因此,提出了一个统一地中海饮食评分(UMEDS)框架。该框架由10个食物组组成(全谷物、水果、蔬菜、乳制品、鱼类、豆类、橄榄油、坚果和种子、家禽以及红肉)。这些食物组是传统地中海饮食的共同要素。除了与食物相关的成分外,UMEDS还涉及身体活动、睡眠、社交以及特定文化的食物消费(主要是基于橄榄油的复合菜肴)。针对这些项目中的每一项,都提出了基于证据的临界值。UMEDS的总分范围为0至22分,分数越高表明遵循程度越高(≤12分为低遵循,13 - 17分为中等遵循,≥18分为高遵循)。通过整合饮食摄入、生活方式习惯和文化习俗的关键要素,UMEDS提供了一种全面统一的方法,符合全球健康指南,并反映了植根于食物、生活方式、文化、生活方式以及传统知识和实践的地中海饮食的真正精神。