• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道自然腔道手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的比较:对术后疼痛、性功能及手术结局的影响

Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Surgery (vNOTES) and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation: Effects on Postoperative Pain, Sexual Functions, and Surgical Outcomes.

作者信息

Genco Mehmet, Genco Merve, Azmak Çinaz Feyza, Çinaz Semih

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Türkiye. (Dr. Genco).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri State Hospital, Kayseri, Türkiye. (Dr. Genco).

出版信息

JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062
PMID:41031224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12479056/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive technique that eliminates the need for abdominal incisions. Compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL), vNOTES may offer reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. While laparoscopy is the standard method for bilateral tubal ligation (BTL), limited comparative data exist regarding vNOTES for this indication.

AIM

To compare postoperative outcomes, pain levels, and sexual function following BTL performed via vNOTES versus CL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included 43 women who underwent elective BTL between September 2023 and December 2024 (vNOTES: n = 23; CL: n = 20). Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Shoulder pain incidence, intra-abdominal pressure, need for intraoperative opioids, and 6-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) scores were also evaluated. Operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed without major complications. VAS pain scores at all measured time points were significantly lower in the vNOTES group ( < .05). Shoulder pain occurred in 15% of vNOTES cases versus 85% in the CL group ( < .001). Intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower in the vNOTES group ( < .05). No significant differences were observed between groups in sexual function scores, operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay ( > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

vNOTES is a safe and effective alternative to CL for female sterilization. It offers significant benefits in terms of reduced early postoperative and shoulder pain, without negatively affecting sexual function or surgical safety. These findings highlight the potential advantages of vNOTES as a minimally invasive technique in gynecologic surgery.

摘要

引言

经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)是一种新型的微创技术,无需腹部切口。与传统腹腔镜手术(CL)相比,vNOTES可能会减轻术后疼痛并加快恢复速度。虽然腹腔镜手术是双侧输卵管结扎(BTL)的标准方法,但关于vNOTES用于该适应症的比较数据有限。

目的

比较经vNOTES与CL进行BTL后的术后结果、疼痛程度和性功能。

材料与方法

这项回顾性比较研究纳入了2023年9月至2024年12月期间接受择期BTL的43名女性(vNOTES组:n = 23;CL组:n = 20)。术后1小时、6小时和24小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛。还评估了肩部疼痛发生率、腹内压、术中使用阿片类药物的需求以及6项女性性功能指数(FSFI-6)评分。记录手术时间、失血量和住院时间。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,无重大并发症。vNOTES组在所有测量时间点的VAS疼痛评分均显著更低(P <.05)。vNOTES组15%的病例出现肩部疼痛,而CL组为85%(P <.001)。vNOTES组的腹内压和术中阿片类药物需求量显著更低(P <.05)。两组在性功能评分、手术时间、失血量或住院时间方面未观察到显著差异(P >.05)。

结论

vNOTES是CL用于女性绝育的一种安全有效的替代方法。它在减轻术后早期疼痛和肩部疼痛方面具有显著优势,且不负面影响性功能或手术安全性。这些发现凸显了vNOTES作为妇科手术微创技术的潜在优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Surgery (vNOTES) and Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation: Effects on Postoperative Pain, Sexual Functions, and Surgical Outcomes.经阴道自然腔道手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜输卵管结扎术的比较:对术后疼痛、性功能及手术结局的影响
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00062. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
2
Outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy: a multi-centre retrospective study from Turkey (TR-MIGS).
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Dec;45(1):2548809. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2025.2548809. Epub 2025 Sep 13.
3
Comparative outcomes of hysterectomy using single-port umbilical laparoscopy versus vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.单孔脐部腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术的比较结果
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Aug;34(4):318-323. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2490080. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
4
Comparison of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in previous pelvic surgery: a retrospective study.既往盆腔手术中传统腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16525-0.
5
Early experience with the gasless vNOTES technique for adnexal surgery.无气单孔腹腔镜附件手术的早期经验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1232-1238. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16136. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
6
Comparison of postoperative pain rates with different hysterectomy techniques: A retrospective study.不同子宫切除术技术术后疼痛率的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44374. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044374.
7
Robotic single port versus robotic multiple port transvaginal orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.机器人单孔与机器人多孔经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术:手术结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 21;19(1):410. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02593-x.
8
Can vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy be performed in patients with an enlarged uterus?子宫增大的患者可以进行经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Jun;51(6):e16345. doi: 10.1111/jog.16345.
9
Using robotic single-port vNOTES for gynaecological oncology: omentectomy in a patient with an ovarian granulosa cell tumor-a case study.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Dec;45(1):2556279. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2025.2556279. Epub 2025 Sep 7.
10
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流