Minami Yoshiyasu, Warisawa Takayuki, Katsura Aritomo, Tsuda Takuma, Hagiya Kenichi, Shishido Koki, Hashimoto Takuya, Ashikaga Takashi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0375, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01207-5.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly with technological advances, allowing for higher procedural success rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the growing complexity of cases involving severely calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and chronic total occlusions has increased procedural challenges. In such scenarios, the guide extension catheter (GEC, or guiding catheter extension) plays a critical role by enhancing device passage and providing additional backup support, making it indispensable in modern PCI. Various types of GECs offer distinct characteristics that influence their selection based on lesion type, device compatibility, and procedural requirements. The GEC is used for multiple purposes, including backup support, deep engagement, imaging device insertion, stent protection, thrombectomy, and foreign body removal. Despite its utility, GEC use is associated with potential complications, including vessel injury, thrombosis, air embolism, and hemodynamic instability. Careful technique and proper selection are critical to minimizing risks. Overall, the GEC is an essential tool in complex PCI procedures, offering significant advantages in improving procedural success.