• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非创伤性儿科患者腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in non-traumatic pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sato Alma, Alogakos Marios, Burns James W F, Roberts Megan, Grammenou Dafni-Stravroula, Ghotra Ebaney, Lugard Emily E, Chidiac Charbel, Than Christian Aloysius, Nakanishi Hayato, Kunisaki Shaun M

机构信息

University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, 2417, Nicosia, Cyprus.

St George's University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Oct 17;41(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06208-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-025-06208-2
PMID:41107569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12534274/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the preferred surgical approach for pediatric patients requiring splenectomy, though gaps remain regarding spleen size impact on outcomes and conversion rates, especially in children with hematologic disorders.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to January 2025, following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025644989). Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 216 studies, 19 studies with 1898 pediatric patients included. Of those, 1202 underwent LS and 696 open splenectomy (OS). LS was associated with shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.59 days, 95% CI: -2.18 to -1.00, P < 0.00001), faster initiation of oral feeding (MD: -0.68 days, 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.29, P = 0.0006), fewer transfusions (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.62, P = 0.0001), and conversion to OS in 2.7% of cases. OS showed shorter operative time (MD: 60.4 min, 95% CI: 37.4 to 83.4, P < 0.00001), and improved accessory spleen removal (OR: 1.91, 95% Cl: 1.02 to 3.57, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support LS as a safe and effective technique in pediatric hematologic patients and provide updated evidence to guide surgical decision-making.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)是需要脾切除的儿科患者的首选手术方法,不过关于脾脏大小对手术结果和中转率的影响仍存在差距,尤其是在患有血液系统疾病的儿童中。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,从创刊至2025年1月,在PubMed、Medline、CINAHL、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,并在PROSPERO(CRD42025644989)注册。使用随机效应模型进行统计分析。

结果

初步检索得到216项研究,纳入19项研究共1898例儿科患者。其中,1202例行LS,696例行开放性脾切除术(OS)。LS与住院时间缩短(MD:-1.59天,95%CI:-2.18至-1.00,P<0.00001)、开始经口喂养更快(MD:-0.68天,95%CI:-1.07至-0.29,P=0.0006)、输血次数减少(OR=0.38,95%CI:0.23至0.62,P=0.0001)相关,2.7%的病例中转至OS。OS显示手术时间较短(MD:60.4分钟,95%CI:37.4至83.4,P<0.00001),副脾切除改善(OR:1.91,95%Cl:1.02至3.57,P=0.04)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持LS作为儿科血液系统疾病患者的一种安全有效的技术,并提供了最新证据以指导手术决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/6a596de992f2/383_2025_6208_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/8145dfba0a1c/383_2025_6208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/c74a1f00fdb8/383_2025_6208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/59d0b2f61773/383_2025_6208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/6a596de992f2/383_2025_6208_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/8145dfba0a1c/383_2025_6208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/c74a1f00fdb8/383_2025_6208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/59d0b2f61773/383_2025_6208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d237/12534274/6a596de992f2/383_2025_6208_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in non-traumatic pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非创伤性儿科患者腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Oct 17;41(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06208-2.
2
Early outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic splenectomy in pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科人群中机器人辅助与腹腔镜脾切除术的早期结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Oct 7;25(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-06198-z.
3
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Mar;32(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3845-2. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Sep 19;9(9):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub4.
5
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
6
Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.小儿经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CTLA)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;184(7):445. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06286-3.
7
Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Benign Hematological Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.成人良性血液系统疾病的腹腔镜脾切除术:一项系统评价
In Vivo. 2017 May-Jun;31(3):291-302. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11058.
8
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.子宫肌瘤的微创手术技术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3.
9
Comparing laparoscopic and robotic splenectomy: A systematic review of the outcomes.比较腹腔镜与机器人辅助脾切除术:结局的系统评价
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_330_24.
10
Open versus laparoscopic approach for intestinal malrotation in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.婴儿和儿童肠旋转不良的开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Dec;32(12):1157-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3974-2. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Concurrent Cholecystectomy Does Not Increase Splenectomy Morbidity in Patients With Hemolytic Anemia: A Pediatric NSQIP Analysis.溶血性贫血患者行胆囊切除术同期行脾切除术并不会增加发病率:一项儿科 NSQIP 分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jan;59(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
2
Selection of surgical modality for massive splenomegaly in children.儿童巨大脾肿大的手术方式选择。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9070-9079. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10462-7. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Twenty-Five-Year Experience with Minimally Invasive Splenectomy in Children: From Minilaparotomy to Use of Sealing Devices and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technology: Tips and Tricks and Technical Considerations.
二十五年来儿童微创脾切除术的经验:从迷你剖腹术到使用密封设备和吲哚菁绿荧光技术:技巧和技术考虑因素。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Sep;32(9):1010-1015. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0038. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open partial splenectomy in children and adolescents.儿童及青少年腹腔镜与开放性部分脾切除术围手术期结果的比较。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):979-987. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.979.
5
Comparison of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术治疗特发性血小板减少性紫癜的临床疗效比较:Meta 分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24436. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024436.
6
Open Versus Laparoscopic Splenectomies in Children: A Comparative Study Performed at a Public Hospital in Brazil.儿童开放性与腹腔镜脾切除术:在巴西一家公立医院进行的对比研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Oct;29(10):1357-1361. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0123. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
7
Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Has It Become the Standard Surgical Approach in Pediatric Patients?腹腔镜脾切除术:是否已成为小儿患者的标准手术方法?
J Surg Res. 2019 Aug;240:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.045. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
8
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear.腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术治疗脾肿大:结果尚不清楚。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1298-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6394-7. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
10
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Mar;32(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3845-2. Epub 2015 Dec 11.