Suppr超能文献

婴儿和儿童肠旋转不良的开放手术与腹腔镜手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Open versus laparoscopic approach for intestinal malrotation in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Catania Vincenzo Davide, Lauriti Giuseppe, Pierro Agostino, Zani Augusto

机构信息

Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 1524C-555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, "Spirito Santo" Hospital, Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Dec;32(12):1157-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3974-2. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although the principles of the Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in children have remained unchanged since its first description, in the era of minimally invasive surgery it is controversial whether laparoscopy is advantageous over open surgery. The aim of our study was to determine whether the surgical approach for the treatment of malrotation had an impact on patient outcome.

METHODS

Using a defined strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science MeSH headings), two investigators independently searched for studies comparing open versus laparoscopic Ladd's procedure in children. Case reports and opinion articles were excluded. Outcome measures included age at operation, time to full enteral feeding, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. Maneuvers were compared using Fisher's exact test and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Of 308 abstracts screened, 49 full-text articles were analyzed and nine (all retrospective) met our search criteria. Selected articles included 1003 patients, of whom 744 (74 %) underwent open surgery and 259 (26 %) laparoscopy. Patients who had open surgery were younger (0.9 ± 1.2 years) than those who underwent laparoscopy (2.6 ± 3 years; p < 0.0001). Laparoscopy was converted to open Ladd's in 25.3 % patients. Laparoscopy was associated with faster full enteral feeding (1.5 ± 0.3 days) in comparison to open surgery (4.6 ± 0.1 days, p < 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (5.9 ± 4.3 days) than in the open group (11.2 ± 6.7 days; p < 0.0001). Open surgery was associated with higher overall post-operative complication rate (21 %) than laparoscopy (8 %; p < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in the prevalence of post-operative bowel obstruction (open, n = 10 %; laparoscopy, n = 0 % p = 0.07), post-operative volvulus was more frequent in the laparoscopy group (3.5 %) than in the open group (1.4 %, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Comparative but non-randomized studies indicate that laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is not commonly performed in young children. Although one third of laparoscopic procedures is converted to open surgery, laparoscopy is associated with shorter time to full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay. However, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure seems to have higher incidence of post-operative volvulus. Prospective randomized studies with long follow-up are needed to confirm present outcome data and determine the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.

摘要

目的

尽管自首次描述以来,儿童肠旋转不良的Ladd手术原则一直未变,但在微创手术时代,腹腔镜手术是否优于开放手术仍存在争议。我们研究的目的是确定治疗肠旋转不良的手术方式是否会对患者预后产生影响。

方法

两名研究者采用既定策略(通过PubMed、Cochrane、Embase和科学网医学主题词)独立检索比较儿童开放与腹腔镜Ladd手术的研究。排除病例报告和观点文章。观察指标包括手术年龄、完全肠内喂养时间、住院时间和术后并发症。采用Fisher精确检验比较各项操作,并使用RevMan 5.3进行荟萃分析。数据以均数±标准差表示。

结果

在筛选的308篇摘要中,分析了49篇全文文章,其中9篇(均为回顾性研究)符合我们的检索标准。入选文章共纳入1003例患者,其中744例(74%)接受开放手术,259例(26%)接受腹腔镜手术。接受开放手术的患者比接受腹腔镜手术的患者年龄更小(0.9±1.2岁 vs. 2.6±3岁;p<0.0001)。25.3%的患者腹腔镜手术转为开放Ladd手术。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术患者完全肠内喂养时间更快(1.5±0.3天 vs. 4.6±0.1天,p<0.0001)。腹腔镜组住院时间短于开放组(5.9±4.3天 vs. 11.2±6.7天;p<0.0001)。开放手术的总体术后并发症发生率(21%)高于腹腔镜手术(8%;p<0.0001)。尽管术后肠梗阻的发生率无差异(开放手术组为10%,腹腔镜手术组为0%,p=0.07),但腹腔镜组术后肠扭转的发生率高于开放组(3.5% vs. 1.4%,p=0.04)。

结论

比较性但非随机研究表明,腹腔镜Ladd手术在幼儿中并不常用。尽管三分之一的腹腔镜手术会转为开放手术,但腹腔镜手术与完全肠内喂养时间缩短和住院时间缩短相关。然而,腹腔镜Ladd手术术后肠扭转的发生率似乎更高。需要进行长期随访的前瞻性随机研究来证实目前的预后数据,并确定腹腔镜手术方式的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验