Suppr超能文献

数字健康干预措施的设计与部署,以降低数字鸿沟风险并为新冠康复期生活的发展提供信息:一项系统综述。

Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review.

作者信息

Hamilton Fiona L, Imran Sumayyah, Mahmood Aamina, Dobbin Joanna, Bradbury Katherine, Poduval Shoba, Scuffell Jamie, Thomas Fred, Stevenson Fiona

机构信息

eHealth Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.

UCL Medical School, UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Oct;13(39):1-18. doi: 10.3310/GJHG1331.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health interventions can support health-related knowledge transfer, for example through websites or mobile applications, and may reduce health inequalities by making health care available, where access is difficult, and by translating content to overcome language barriers. However, digital health intervention can also increase health inequalities due to the digital divide. To reach digitally excluded populations, design and delivery mechanisms need to specifically address this issue. This review was conducted during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and informed the rapid design, deployment and evaluation of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation digital health intervention: 'Living with COVID Recovery' (LWCR). LWCR needed to be engaging and usable for patients and to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. LWCR was introduced as a service into 33 NHS clinics, was used by 7679 patients, and evaluation ran from August 2020 to December 2022.

OBJECTIVE

To identify evidence-based digital health intervention design and deployment features conducive to mitigating the digital divide.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, PROSPERO, PubMed (with MEDLINE and Europe PMC) and Turning Research into Practice; OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched for primary research studies published in English from 1 October 2011 to 1 October 2021. Adults who were likely to be affected by the digital divide, including older age, minority ethnic groups, lower income/education level and in any healthcare setting.

INTERVENTIONS

Any digital health intervention with features of design and/or deployment intended to enable access and engagement by the population of focus.

COMPARATORS

Any or none.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Any related to participants' access and/or use of digital health intervention and/or change in digital skills and confidence.

ANALYSIS

Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, narratively synthesised and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Digital health interventions evaluated included telehealth, text message interventions, virtual assistants, self-management programmes and decision aids. Co-development with end-users, user testing through iterative design cycles, digital health interventions that also helped improve digital skills and digital health literacy, tailoring for low literacy through animations, pictures, videos and writing for low reading ages; virtual assistants to collect information from patients and guide the use of a digital health intervention.

DEPLOYMENT THEMES INCLUDED

Free devices and data, or signposting to sources of cheap/free devices and Wi-Fi, text message interventions, providing 'human support', providing tailored digital skills education as part of the intervention and enabling peer/family support.

LIMITATIONS

Our search extended to late 2021, and there has been a massive increase in the literature following the pandemic. However, as our review was undertaken to inform the LWCR digital health intervention design and deployment, we have reported the results that informed this work. The studies included in the review were heterogeneous, so generalisability may be limited. Few randomised controlled trials assessed the digital health intervention's impact on digital health skills by using validated measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the design and deployment findings described above when developing digital health interventions may help overcome the digital divide. Beyond informing the LWCR digital health intervention development, the review findings have wider implications for the equitable design, delivery and evaluation of digital health interventions.

FUNDING

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR132243.

摘要

背景

数字健康干预措施能够支持与健康相关的知识传播,例如通过网站或移动应用程序,并且可以通过在难以获得医疗服务的地区提供医疗保健,以及通过翻译内容来克服语言障碍,从而减少健康不平等现象。然而,由于数字鸿沟,数字健康干预措施也可能加剧健康不平等。为了覆盖那些被数字技术排斥的人群,设计和交付机制需要专门解决这一问题。本综述是在不断演变的新冠疫情期间进行的,为新冠疫情后康复数字健康干预措施“新冠康复生活”(LWCR)的快速设计、部署和评估提供了参考。LWCR需要对患者具有吸引力且易于使用,并避免加剧健康不平等。LWCR作为一项服务被引入33家国民保健服务(NHS)诊所,有7679名患者使用,评估从2020年8月持续到2022年12月。

目的

确定有助于缩小数字鸿沟的基于证据的数字健康干预设计和部署特征。

方法

检索考克兰图书馆、Epistemonikos、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所证据库、PROSPERO、PubMed(包括MEDLINE和欧洲生物医学中心)以及“将研究转化为实践”;搜索OpenGrey和谷歌学术,查找2011年10月1日至2021年10月1日期间以英文发表的原发性研究。研究对象为可能受到数字鸿沟影响的成年人,包括老年人、少数族裔群体、低收入/低教育水平人群以及处于任何医疗环境中的人群。

干预措施

任何具有旨在使目标人群能够获取并参与的设计和/或部署特征的数字健康干预措施。

对照

任何对照或无对照。

结局指标

任何与参与者获取和/或使用数字健康干预措施以及/或者数字技能和信心变化相关的指标。

分析

提取符合纳入标准的研究数据,进行叙述性综合分析和主题分析。

结果

22篇论文符合纳入标准。所评估的数字健康干预措施包括远程医疗、短信干预、虚拟助手、自我管理项目和决策辅助工具。与最终用户共同开发,通过迭代设计周期进行用户测试,有助于提高数字技能和数字健康素养的数字健康干预措施,通过动画、图片、视频以及针对低阅读年龄人群的文字编写来为低识字水平人群量身定制;使用虚拟助手从患者那里收集信息并指导数字健康干预措施的使用。

部署主题包括

免费设备和数据,或指引到廉价/免费设备及Wi-Fi来源,短信干预,提供“人力支持”,作为干预措施的一部分提供量身定制的数字技能教育,以及实现同伴/家庭支持。

局限性

我们的检索截至2021年末,疫情之后文献数量大幅增加。然而,由于我们开展本综述是为LWCR数字健康干预措施的设计和部署提供参考,我们报告了为这项工作提供参考的结果。综述中纳入的研究具有异质性,因此普遍性可能有限。很少有随机对照试验使用经过验证的测量方法来评估数字健康干预措施对数字健康技能的影响。

结论

在开发数字健康干预措施时使用上述设计和部署结果可能有助于克服数字鸿沟。除了为LWCR数字健康干预措施的开发提供参考外,综述结果对数字健康干预措施的公平设计、交付和评估具有更广泛的意义。

资助

本文介绍了由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会保健交付研究项目资助的独立研究,资助编号为NIHR132243。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验