• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗上肢痉挛的颈胸段背根切断术:一项系统评价

Cervicothoracic dorsal rhizotomy for the management of upper limb spasticity: a systematic review.

作者信息

de Laurentis Camilla, Dauleac Corentin, Beuriat Pierre-Aurélien, Mertens Patrick

机构信息

Pediatric Neurosurgery Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 59, Bd Pinel, 69003, Lyon, France.

Université Lyon 1, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Nov 1;48(1):753. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03913-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03913-3
PMID:41174259
Abstract

Lumbar selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a well-established surgical procedure for managing lower limb spasticity. However, its application for upper limb spasticity remains limited. This systematic review aims to analyze and synthesize the existing literature on cervicothoracic SDR for upper limb spasticity, focusing on surgical techniques, its effectiveness, and associated outcomes. A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting at least one new case of cervicothoracic SDR for upper limb spasticity were included. Data extraction encompassed demographics, etiology, surgical details, pre- and postoperative spasticity and motor function assessments, and complications. Descriptive statistics and paired-sample t-tests were applied to assess outcomes, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. A total of 10 studies (48 patients) met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 20.0 ± 13.3 years, with 60.4% pediatric patients. The most common etiologies were cerebral palsy (52.1%), traumatic brain injury (18.7%), and stroke (16.7%). SDR was unilateral in 75% of cases. The mean follow-up was 14.0 ± 7.3 months. Spasticity significantly decreased in 95.6% of patients (p < 0.001 for all muscle groups). Functional assessments demonstrated significant improvement in fine motor skills (p < 0.001), grasping strength (p = 0.005), and pinch strength (p = 0.003). Sensory deficits were reported in 35.3% of cases postoperatively. Complications included infection (2.1%), long-term neuropathic pain (6.3%), and spasticity recurrence (6.5%). Cervicothoracic SDR appears to be a promising surgical option for managing upper limb spasticity, with a favorable benefit-risk profile. Despite encouraging results, further prospective studies with standardized assessment protocols are required to refine patient selection criteria and optimize surgical outcomes.

摘要

腰椎选择性背根切断术(SDR)是一种成熟的治疗下肢痉挛的外科手术。然而,其在上肢痉挛治疗中的应用仍然有限。本系统评价旨在分析和综合现有的关于颈胸段SDR治疗上肢痉挛的文献,重点关注手术技术、有效性及相关结果。按照PRISMA指南,于2024年在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献综述。纳入报告至少1例颈胸段SDR治疗上肢痉挛新病例的研究。数据提取包括人口统计学、病因、手术细节、术前和术后痉挛及运动功能评估以及并发症。应用描述性统计和配对样本t检验评估结果,设定统计学显著性为p<0.05。共有10项研究(48例患者)符合纳入标准。平均年龄为20.0±13.3岁,儿科患者占60.4%。最常见的病因是脑瘫(52.1%)、创伤性脑损伤(18.7%)和中风(16.7%)。75%的病例为单侧SDR。平均随访时间为14.0±7.3个月。95.6%的患者痉挛明显减轻(所有肌肉群p<0.001)。功能评估显示精细运动技能(p<0.001)、抓握力(p=0.005)和捏力(p=0.003)有显著改善。术后35.3%的病例报告有感觉缺陷。并发症包括感染(2.1%)、长期神经性疼痛(6.3%)和痉挛复发(6.5%)。颈胸段SDR似乎是治疗上肢痉挛的一种有前景的手术选择,具有良好的效益风险比。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但仍需要进一步采用标准化评估方案的前瞻性研究,以完善患者选择标准并优化手术结果。

相似文献

1
Cervicothoracic dorsal rhizotomy for the management of upper limb spasticity: a systematic review.用于治疗上肢痉挛的颈胸段背根切断术:一项系统评价
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Nov 1;48(1):753. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03913-3.
2
Enhancement of postural control and upper limb function following selective dorsal rhizotomy: a retrospectively registered study.选择性背根切断术后姿势控制和上肢功能的改善:一项回顾性注册研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Sep 3;184(9):589. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06388-y.
3
Selective dorsal rhizotomy for the treatment of severe spastic cerebral palsy: efficacy and therapeutic durability in GMFCS grade IV and V children.选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗重度痉挛型脑瘫:GMFCS IV级和V级儿童的疗效及治疗持久性
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Apr;160(4):811-821. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3349-z. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
4
Long-term functional benefits of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy.选择性背根切断术治疗痉挛型脑瘫的长期功能益处。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Aug;12(2):142-50. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12539. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Whether the newly modified rhizotomy protocol is applicable to guide single-level approach SDR to treat spastic quadriplegia and diplegia in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy?新改良的神经根切断术方案是否适用于指导单节段选择性脊神经后根切断术(SDR)治疗小儿脑瘫患者的痉挛性四肢瘫和双瘫?
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Sep;36(9):1935-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04368-w. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Palliative single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy for children with spastic cerebral palsy Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV and V: a case series and systematic review of the literature.痉挛型脑瘫患儿行姑息性单节段选择性脊神经后根切断术:一项病例系列研究和文献系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2024 Jun;56(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2024.3.FOCUS2478.
7
Upper-extremity spasticity and functionality after selective dorsal rhizotomy for cerebral palsy: a systematic review.选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗脑瘫后上肢痉挛和功能:系统评价。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023 Sep 15;32(6):673-685. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.PEDS22526. Print 2023 Dec 1.
8
Cervical dorsal rhizotomy for upper limbs spasticity. Case report.颈椎后路脊神经后根切断术治疗上肢痉挛。病例报告。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 28;166(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06041-x.
9
Systematic review on use and efficacy of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the management of spasticity in non-pediatric patients.系统评价选择性脊神经后根切断术(SDR)在非儿科患者痉挛管理中的应用和疗效。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Jun;37(6):1837-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05167-y. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
10
Reduction in upper-extremity tone after lumbar selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic cerebral palsy.痉挛型脑瘫患儿行腰椎选择性背根切断术后上肢肌张力降低
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Dec;12(6):588-94. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.PEDS12591. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervicothoracic ventral-dorsal rhizotomy for bilateral upper-extremity hypertonia in cerebral palsy: illustrative case.颈胸段腹背侧神经根切断术治疗脑瘫双侧上肢肌张力亢进:病例展示
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024 Apr 1;7(14). doi: 10.3171/CASE2438.
2
Cervical dorsal rhizotomy for upper limbs spasticity. Case report.颈椎后路脊神经后根切断术治疗上肢痉挛。病例报告。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 28;166(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06041-x.
3
Neuromodulation and quality of life for patient with spasticity after spinal cord injury.
脊髓损伤后痉挛患者的神经调节与生活质量。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2023;172:79-99. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Linking corticospinal tract activation and upper-limb motor control in adults with cerebral palsy.将大脑性麻痹成人的皮质脊髓束激活与上肢运动控制相联系。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Apr;66(4):523-530. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15750. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT).杰布森-泰勒手功能测试(JTHFT)的心理测量特性的系统评价。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct;40(5):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Systematic review on use and efficacy of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the management of spasticity in non-pediatric patients.系统评价选择性脊神经后根切断术(SDR)在非儿科患者痉挛管理中的应用和疗效。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Jun;37(6):1837-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05167-y. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Contralateral C7 nerve transfer through posterior vertebral approach combined with selective posterior rhizotomy of the affected cervical nerve in the treatment of central upper limb spastic paralysis: A case report.后路 C7 神经移位术联合选择性颈后根切断术治疗中枢性上肢痉挛性瘫痪:病例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 26;100(12):e25061. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025061.
9
The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity.肉毒杆菌毒素在痉挛治疗中的应用。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2021;263:127-146. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_315.
10
The Evolution of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for the Management of Spasticity.选择性脊神经后跟切断术治疗痉挛的演变。
Neurotherapeutics. 2019 Jan;16(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-00690-4.