• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前使用脂质体布比卡因联合引流管患者自控镇痛进行胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心、双盲、随机对照研究方案

Effect of preoperative thoracic paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine combined with drainage-tube patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled study protocol.

作者信息

Sun Yongtao, Guo Na, Fang Tinghao, Feng Yanyan, Liu Peng, Sun Dongfeng, Li Yongmeng, Liu Kexuan, Ren Yiyan, Li Minghui, Liu Qiuyue, Yang Xiaoling, Chi Yongliang, Liu Zhongkai, Yuan Li, Lang Bao, Yang Zaiqi, Feng Nianhai, You Peijun, Zhang Wensheng, Su Diansan, Wu Jianbo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.

Shandong Institute of Anesthesia and Respiratory Critical Medicine, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Nov 6;14(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00564-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13741-025-00564-2
PMID:
41199334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12593884/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is increasingly used for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing thoracic surgery, but relevant data are scarce, and there are few data on LB-TPVB combined with drainage tube patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The aim of this study is to explore the effect of LB-TPVB combined with drainage-tube PCA on postoperative pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Participants will be randomly assigned to the standard bupivacaine (SB) group, SB + drainage-tube PCA (DTA) group, LB group, or LB + DTA group. The primary outcome is the 72-h mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at rest. The target sample size is 228 patients, with 57 patients in each group.

DISCUSSION

Our study hypothesizes that preoperative ultrasound-guided thoracic nerve block combined with drainage tube self-controlled analgesia is more effective in reducing postoperative pain following thoracoscopic lobe resection compared to thoracic nerve block alone. Additionally, liposomal bupivacaine was found to be more effective than standard bupivacaine in this context. These results will have implications for improving postoperative analgesia protocols for patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06165991. Registered 29 November 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06165991 .

摘要

背景

脂质体布比卡因(LB)用于胸段椎旁阻滞(TPVB)以控制胸科手术患者术后疼痛的情况日益增多,但相关数据匮乏,关于LB-TPVB联合引流管患者自控镇痛(PCA)的数据更是稀少。本研究旨在探讨LB-TPVB联合引流管PCA对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛的影响。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。参与者将被随机分配至标准布比卡因(SB)组、SB + 引流管PCA(DTA)组、LB组或LB + DTA组。主要结局指标为静息状态下72小时平均数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分。目标样本量为228例患者,每组57例。

讨论

我们的研究假设,与单纯胸段神经阻滞相比,术前超声引导下胸段神经阻滞联合引流管自控镇痛在减轻胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛方面更有效。此外,在此背景下发现脂质体布比卡因比标准布比卡因更有效。这些结果将对改善胸腔镜肺手术患者的术后镇痛方案具有指导意义。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT06165991。于2023年11月29日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06165991 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/a7e01051122e/13741_2025_564_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/698d6840a9e5/13741_2025_564_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/8fdb505a4155/13741_2025_564_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/a7e01051122e/13741_2025_564_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/698d6840a9e5/13741_2025_564_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/8fdb505a4155/13741_2025_564_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5aa/12593884/a7e01051122e/13741_2025_564_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of preoperative thoracic paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine combined with drainage-tube patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative pain after thoracoscopic lobectomy: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled study protocol.术前使用脂质体布比卡因联合引流管患者自控镇痛进行胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心、双盲、随机对照研究方案
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Nov 6;14(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00564-2.
2
Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Preoperative Thoracic Paravertebral Blockade on Postoperative Pain Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.脂质体布比卡因用于术前胸椎旁神经阻滞对电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2026 Jan;40(1):281-289. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.040. Epub 2025 Sep 22.
3
Efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block with liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing liver resection: A randomized controlled trial.脂质体布比卡因胸椎旁阻滞用于肝切除患者术后镇痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Sep;106:111968. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111968. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
4
Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Plain Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone for Rhomboid Intercostal Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial.脂质体布比卡因与普通布比卡因联合地塞米松用于菱形肌肋间阻滞在电视辅助胸腔镜手术后疼痛管理中的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验
Pain Ther. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00763-1.
5
Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.脂质体布比卡因与普通布比卡因用于胸腔镜肺切除患者的胸椎旁阻滞:一项随机对照研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Aug 12;19:6955-6964. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S532122. eCollection 2025.
6
Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after the Nuss procedure in children: A randomized clinical trial.超声引导下脂质体布比卡因与非脂质体布比卡因用于儿童Nuss手术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Sep;106:111953. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111953. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
7
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block Reduces Opioid Consumption and Accelerates Recovery After Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.脂质体布比卡因用于超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞可减少胸科手术后阿片类药物的使用并加速康复:一项随机对照试验
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Oct 7;19:9137-9149. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S550595. eCollection 2025.
8
Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous intertransverse process block and continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a double-blind, prospective, randomised controlled trial.超声引导下连续横突间阻滞与连续竖脊肌平面阻滞用于单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术后镇痛的比较:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 28;15(9):e099082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099082.
9
Comparison of continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block (cSAPB) with bupivacaine versus single liposomal bupivacaine block in postoperative analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS): a randomized controlled trial.连续前锯肌平面阻滞(cSAPB)联合布比卡因与单剂量脂质体布比卡因阻滞用于电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03249-x.
10
The impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block combined with paravertebral block on postoperative rebound pain following thoracoscopic lobectomy.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞联合椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后疼痛反弹的影响
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 7;12:1651245. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1651245. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in open total abdominal hysterectomy.脂质体布比卡因与罗哌卡因用于开放性全腹子宫切除术时腹横肌平面阻滞的比较
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Jun 30;35(6):746-750. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2090798. eCollection 2022.
2
2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.2022年欧洲心脏病学会非心脏手术患者心血管评估与管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
3
Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for pain control in shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
脂质体布比卡因在肩关节手术中控制疼痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):1957-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.037. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Blocks Before Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.股管内阻滞注射脂质体布比卡因对全膝关节置换术后转归的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1549-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.073. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Randomized Trial of Bupivacaine Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.随机对照试验:布比卡因对比脂质体布比卡因在微创肺叶切除术中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct;114(4):1128-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.058. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Standard Bupivacaine with Perineural Dexamethasone: A Noninferiority Trial.超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞:脂质体布比卡因与布比卡因复合地塞米松的比较——一项非劣效性试验
Anesthesiology. 2022 Mar 1;136(3):434-447. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004111.
7
Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery: The EXPLANE randomized trial.腹横肌平面阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因与连续硬膜外镇痛用于腹部大手术:EXPLANE 随机试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 May;77:110640. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110640. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
8
A multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of liposomal bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia in pediatric patients aged 6 to less than 17 years (PLAY).一项多中心研究,旨在评估脂微球布比卡因在 6 岁至 17 岁以下儿科患者术后镇痛中的药代动力学和安全性(PLAY)。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110503. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110503. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
9
Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Standard Bupivacaine in the Adductor Canal for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.经股动脉入路与经肱动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的对比研究
Orthopedics. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(4):249-255. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20210621-01. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Retrolaminar Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Pain Relief After Less-Invasive Lung Surgery: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial.椎板后阻滞与椎旁阻滞用于微创肺切除术后疼痛缓解的比较:一项随机、非劣效性对照试验
Cureus. 2021 Feb 27;13(2):e13597. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13597.