Suppr超能文献

腹横肌平面阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因与连续硬膜外镇痛用于腹部大手术:EXPLANE 随机试验。

Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery: The EXPLANE randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, United States of America; Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, United States of America.

Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, United States of America; Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2022 May;77:110640. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110640. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks with liposomal bupivacaine were to epidural analgesia for pain at rest and opioid consumption in patients recovering from abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND

ERAS pathways suggest TAP blocks in preference to epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, the relative efficacies of TAP blocks and epidural analgesia remains unknown.

METHODS

Patients having major abdominal surgery were enrolled at six sites and randomly assigned 1:1 to thoracic epidural analgesia or bilateral/4-quadrant TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Intravenous opioids were used as needed. Non-inferiority margins were a priori set at 1 point on an 11-point pain numeric rating scale for pain at rest and at a 25% increase in postoperative opioid consumption.

RESULTS

Enrollment was stopped per protocol at 3rd interim analysis after crossing an a priori futility boundary. 498 patients were analyzed (255 had TAP blocks and 243 had epidurals). Pain scores at rest in patients assigned to TAP blocks were significantly non-inferior to those given epidurals, with an estimated difference of 0.09 points (CI: -0.12, 0.30; noninferiority P < 0.001). Opioid consumption during the initial 3 postoperative days in TAP patients was not non-inferior to epidurals, with an estimated ratio of geometric means of 1.37 (CI: 1.05, 1.79; non-inferiority P = 0.754). However, the absolute difference was only 21 mg morphine equivalents over the 3 days. Patients with epidurals were more likely to experience mean arterial pressures <65 mmHg than those given TAP blocks: 48% versus 31%, P = 0.006.

CONCLUSION

Pain scores at rest during the initial three days after major abdominal surgery were similar. Patients assigned to TAP blocks required more opioid then epidural patients but had less hypotension. Clinicians should reconsider epidural analgesia in patients at risk from hypotension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02996227.

摘要

目的

比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与脂质体布比卡因行硬膜外镇痛在腹部手术后患者静息痛和阿片类药物消耗方面的效果。

背景

加速康复外科(ERAS)方案建议 TAP 阻滞优先于硬膜外镇痛用于腹部手术。然而,TAP 阻滞和硬膜外镇痛的相对疗效仍不清楚。

方法

在六个地点纳入行择期腹部大手术的患者,按 1:1 随机分配至接受胸椎硬膜外镇痛或双侧/四象限 TAP 阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因。按需静脉给予阿片类药物。预先设定非劣效性界值为在静息痛的 11 点数字评分量表上相差 1 分和术后阿片类药物消耗增加 25%。

结果

在达到预先设定的无效边界后,根据第 3 次中期分析结果,按方案停止了入组。共分析了 498 例患者(255 例接受 TAP 阻滞,243 例接受硬膜外镇痛)。接受 TAP 阻滞的患者静息痛评分显著不劣于接受硬膜外镇痛的患者,估计差值为 0.09 分(CI:-0.12,0.30;非劣效性 P<0.001)。在 TAP 患者中,术后最初 3 天的阿片类药物消耗并不劣于硬膜外镇痛,几何均数比的估计值为 1.37(CI:1.05,1.79;非劣效性 P=0.754)。然而,3 天内绝对差值仅为 21mg 吗啡等效物。接受硬膜外镇痛的患者比接受 TAP 阻滞的患者更有可能出现平均动脉压<65mmHg:48%比 31%,P=0.006。

结论

在腹部大手术后最初 3 天,静息痛评分相似。接受 TAP 阻滞的患者比接受硬膜外镇痛的患者需要更多的阿片类药物,但低血压的发生率更低。对于有低血压风险的患者,临床医生应重新考虑硬膜外镇痛。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02996227。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验