Miah Ismail, Wong Terry, Zeki Sebastian, Jafari Jafar
Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2025 Oct 31;17(10):e95840. doi: 10.7759/cureus.95840. eCollection 2025 Oct.
Clinical oesophageal physiology is continually evolving through technological advancements, developing hybrid metrics for advanced clinical measurements, and continuously refining the diagnostic guidelines. This has currently placed oesophageal physiology investigation in specialist clinical centres and is excluded from the standard upper gastrointestinal diagnostic testing conducted in general hospitals. Therefore, patients and clinicians in a general hospital have reduced accessibility to oesophageal physiology tests, and patient referrals to specialist centres are only made when all standard oesophageal diagnostic tests are normal or cannot explain the patient's symptoms. As oesophageal physiology is not widely performed in healthcare centres, practitioners in general hospitals may not always think of the oesophageal physiology diagnostic test in their line of investigations. This clinical case study presents a patient under the care of a general hospital who required oesophageal physiology surveillance to see the development of achalasia. The oesophageal physiology primary study diagnosed ineffective oesophageal motility in the absence of reflux disease. The study did, however, capture features that raised suspicion of achalasia developing on high-resolution manometry. The current clinical guidelines do not identify the pre-achalasia state and make no recommendation or set the clinical pathway for repeating the oesophageal physiology or considering oesophageal physiology surveillance. In unwrapping the clinical features for the achalasia development, this case study not only justifies the referral for oesophageal physiology surveillance, but it also offers a learning platform to interpret results beyond the technical finding, addresses pitfalls in the diagnostic guidelines, and introduces useful supplementary tests that can be implemented into routine practice to uncover the correct diagnosis and exclude achalasia mimicking conditions.
临床食管生理学正通过技术进步不断发展,开发用于高级临床测量的混合指标,并持续完善诊断指南。目前,食管生理学检查局限于专科临床中心,被排除在综合医院进行的标准上消化道诊断测试之外。因此,综合医院的患者和临床医生进行食管生理学检查的机会减少,只有在所有标准食管诊断测试均正常或无法解释患者症状时,才会将患者转诊至专科中心。由于食管生理学检查在医疗中心并未广泛开展,综合医院的从业者在其调查过程中可能并不总是会想到食管生理学诊断测试。本临床病例研究介绍了一名在综合医院接受治疗的患者,该患者需要进行食管生理学监测以观察贲门失弛缓症的发展情况。食管生理学初步研究诊断为无反流性疾病的无效食管动力。然而,该研究确实发现了一些特征,这些特征在高分辨率测压中引起了对贲门失弛缓症发展的怀疑。目前的临床指南并未识别出贲门失弛缓症前期状态,也未就重复进行食管生理学检查或考虑食管生理学监测给出建议或设定临床路径。在剖析贲门失弛缓症发展的临床特征时,本病例研究不仅证明了进行食管生理学监测转诊的合理性,还提供了一个学习平台,用于解读技术发现之外的结果,解决诊断指南中的陷阱,并引入可纳入常规实践的有用补充测试,以揭示正确诊断并排除类似贲门失弛缓症的情况。