Suppr超能文献

使用直接注射和滴注静脉胆管造影术对碘番酸和碘多啥酸进行双盲比较。 (注:原文中“lodoxamate”可能有误,推测为“iodoxamate”,若有误请根据正确内容调整译文。)

Double-blind comparison of iodipamide and lodoxamate using direct and drip infusion intravenous cholangiography.

作者信息

Moss A A

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977 Jun;128(6):931-3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.128.6.931.

Abstract

Biliary tract opacification was assessed in a double-blind clinical study that compared iodoxamate with iodipamide. Both drip infusion and direct (bolus) intravenous cholangiography were used to administer the contrast agents. The infusion method with either agent produced better opacification than bolus administration. Regardless of method used, iodoxamate produced greater biliary tract opacification, fewer unexplained failures, and fewer contrast reactions. Neither agent was successful in patients with elevated bilirubin levels, nor did either agent alter hepatic, renal, or hematologic function.

摘要

在一项双盲临床研究中对胆影脒和胆影葡胺进行了比较,评估了胆道显影情况。采用静脉滴注和直接(大剂量)静脉胆管造影两种方式给予造影剂。两种药物采用滴注法给药时的显影效果均优于大剂量给药法。无论采用哪种方式,胆影脒的胆道显影效果更好,原因不明的显影失败情况更少,造影剂不良反应也更少。对于胆红素水平升高的患者,两种药物均未成功显影,且两种药物均未改变肝脏、肾脏或血液学功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验