• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医师助理角色的法定合法化需求。

Need for statutory legitimation of the roles of physician's assistants.

作者信息

Barkin R M

出版信息

Health Serv Rep. 1974 Jan-Feb;89(1):31-6.

PMID:4150002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1616241/
Abstract

A significant constraint on new categories of health manpower is the absence of statutory legitimation of their roles. Licensure has been evolved as an effort to assure high-quality health care, but recently it has been a barrier to effective and innovative use of manpower. Medical and Nurse Practice Acts generally define the practices of medicine and nursing, but they do not define clearly the scope of these practices. Thus, these acts subject physicians to undue risks in delegating responsibilities and Type A assistants (nurses or non-nurses with special training) to undue risks in accepting those functions. Furthermore, only vague guidelines are provided to protect the public and to assure adequate quality control. To date, 35 States have enacted legislation to provide statutory legitimation of Type A assisants and to permit physicians to delegate appropriate responsibilities to new types of health manpower. It is hoped that this legislation will diminish barriers to effective use of health manpower.

摘要

对新型卫生人力的一个重大限制是其角色缺乏法定合法性。执照发放制度的发展是为了确保高质量的医疗保健,但最近它却成为有效和创新利用人力的障碍。《医疗和护士执业法》通常对医疗和护理实践进行了界定,但并未明确界定这些实践的范围。因此,这些法案使医生在 delegating responsibilities 时面临不当风险,也使A型助理(经过特殊培训的护士或非护士)在承担这些职责时面临不当风险。此外,仅提供了模糊的指导方针来保护公众并确保充分的质量控制。迄今为止,35个州已颁布立法,为A型助理提供法定合法性,并允许医生将适当的职责委托给新型卫生人力。希望这项立法将减少有效利用卫生人力的障碍。 (注:原文中“delegating responsibilities”可能有误,结合语境推测可能是“delegating responsibilities”,意为“委托职责” )

相似文献

1
Need for statutory legitimation of the roles of physician's assistants.医师助理角色的法定合法化需求。
Health Serv Rep. 1974 Jan-Feb;89(1):31-6.
2
State legislation for physician's assistants. A review and analysis.医师助理的州立法。综述与分析。
Health Serv Rep. 1973 Jan;88(1):3-12.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
A contemporary analysis of medicolegal concerns for physician assistants and nurse practitioners.对医师助理和执业护士法医学问题的当代分析。
Leg Med. 1994:133-80.
5
Assistants to primary physicians in California.加利福尼亚州初级医师的助手。
West J Med. 1975 Jan;122(1):80-6.
6
The legal status of the physician's assistant.医师助理的法律地位。
Hosp Prog. 1972 Oct;53(10):44-50 passim.
7
Issues confronting the new health professionals.
J Allied Health. 1978 Winter;7(1):64-71.
8
The physician's assistant: a cloudy professional status.
Hosp Med Staff. 1978 Mar;7(3):31-5.
9
Licensure of responsible delegation?责任委托的许可?
N Engl J Med. 1971 Feb 11;284(6):330-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197102112840613.
10
Manpower: How five nations respond to the issues.
Hospitals. 1974 Nov 16;48(22):41-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Directions for statutory change: The physician extender.法定变更说明:医师助理。
Am J Public Health. 1974 Dec;64(12):1132-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.64.12.1132.

本文引用的文献

1
Orderly transfer of procedural responsibilities from medical to nursing actice.将程序责任从医疗实践有序转移至护理实践。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1970 Jun;5(2):311-9.
2
State legislation for physician's assistants. A review and analysis.医师助理的州立法。综述与分析。
Health Serv Rep. 1973 Jan;88(1):3-12.