• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者选择健康保险计划(两部分中的第一部分)。当今医疗保健中的通货膨胀与不公平:成本控制的替代方案及国家健康保险提案分析。

Consumer-choice health plan (first of two parts). Inflation and inequity in health care today: alternatives for cost control and an analysis of proposals for national health insurance.

作者信息

Enthoven A C

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 23;298(12):650-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803232981204.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM197803232981204
PMID:415239
Abstract

The financing system for medical costs in this country suffers from severe inflation and inequity. The tax-supported system of fee for service for doctors, third-party intermediaries and cost reimbursement for hospitals produces inflation by rewarding cost-increasing behavior and failing to provide incentives for economy. The system is inequitable because the government pays more on behalf of those who choose more costly systems of care, because tax benefits subsidize the health insurance of the well-to-do, while not helping many low-income people, and because employment health insurance does not guarantee continuity of coverage and is regressive in its financing. Analysis of previous proposals for national health insurance shows none to be capable of solving most of these problems. Direct economic regulation by government will not improve the situation. Cost controls through incentives and regulated competition in the private sector are most likely to be effective.

摘要

该国的医疗费用融资体系饱受严重通胀和不公平问题的困扰。由税收支持的医生按服务收费、第三方中介以及医院费用报销体系,通过奖励增加成本的行为且未能提供节约成本的激励措施,从而导致了通胀。该体系不公平,原因在于政府为那些选择成本更高的医疗体系的人支付更多费用,税收优惠补贴了富人的医疗保险,却没有帮助到许多低收入人群,还因为就业医疗保险无法保证保险覆盖的连续性,且在融资方面具有累退性。对以往国家医疗保险提案的分析表明,没有一个提案能够解决这些问题中的大部分。政府的直接经济监管无法改善这种状况。通过激励措施以及私营部门的规范竞争来控制成本最有可能产生效果。

相似文献

1
Consumer-choice health plan (first of two parts). Inflation and inequity in health care today: alternatives for cost control and an analysis of proposals for national health insurance.消费者选择健康保险计划(两部分中的第一部分)。当今医疗保健中的通货膨胀与不公平:成本控制的替代方案及国家健康保险提案分析。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 23;298(12):650-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803232981204.
2
Whither private health insurance? Self-destruction or rebirth?私人医疗保险何去何从?自我毁灭还是重生?
Front Health Serv Manage. 1992 Fall;9(1):5-31; discussion 46-7.
3
A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy (2).
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):94-101. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200205.
4
Consumer-Choice Health plan (second of two parts). A national-health-insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector.消费者选择健康计划(两部分中的第二部分)。一项基于私营部门规范竞争的全国医疗保险提案。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 30;298(13):709-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803302981304.
5
The distributional effects of employer and individual health insurance mandates.雇主和个人健康保险强制规定的分配效应。
Inquiry. 1994;31(4):368-84.
6
Variations in health insurance coverage: benefits vs. premiums.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Winter;62(1):53-81.
7
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
8
Introduction to value-based insurance design.基于价值的保险设计简介。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Nov;5(11):1118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.014.
9
A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy (1).
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):29-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200106.
10
Dual choice health insurance policy: a proposal and a cost analysis.双重选择健康保险政策:一项提议及成本分析。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):60-70.

引用本文的文献

1
WHO and its transformation - A journey from 1978 to 2024.世界卫生组织及其变革——从1978年到2024年的历程
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 May;13(5):1589-1593. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_661_24. Epub 2024 May 24.
2
Competition in the Dutch hospital sector: an analysis of health care volume and cost.荷兰医院部门的竞争:医疗服务量与成本分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;18(2):139-153. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0762-9. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Alain Enthoven: An Outspoken Champion for the Prepaid Group Practice.阿兰·恩托文:预付制团体医疗模式的直言不讳的拥护者。
Perm J. 2004 Summer;8(3):31-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/04.927.
4
Risk Protection, Service Use, and Health Outcomes under Colombia's Health Insurance Program for the Poor.哥伦比亚针对贫困人口的医疗保险计划下的风险保护、服务利用及健康结果
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Oct;5(4):61-91. doi: 10.1257/app.5.4.61.
5
Market structure and hospital-insurer bargaining in the Netherlands.荷兰的市场结构与医院-保险公司的谈判
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):589-603. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0273-z. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
6
Exporting the Buyers Health Care Action Group purchasing model: lessons from other communities.推广买家医疗保健行动小组的采购模式:来自其他社区的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(1):149-76. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2005.00339.x.
7
The rise and fall of a Kaiser Permanente expansion region.凯撒医疗集团一个扩张区域的兴衰
Milbank Q. 2003;81(4):567-601. doi: 10.1046/j.0887-378x.2003.00295.x.
8
Consumer price sensitivity and social health insurer choice in Germany and The Netherlands.德国和荷兰的消费者价格敏感度与社会医疗保险选择
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Jun;3(2):117-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023369231291.
9
Growing importance of capitation in Switzerland.按人头付费在瑞士的重要性日益凸显。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Feb;3(2):111-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1019081021645.
10
Managed competition in health care and the unfinished agenda.医疗保健中的管理式竞争与未竟议程。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1986;1986(Spec No):105-19.