• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者选择健康计划(两部分中的第二部分)。一项基于私营部门规范竞争的全国医疗保险提案。

Consumer-Choice Health plan (second of two parts). A national-health-insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector.

作者信息

Enthoven A C

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 30;298(13):709-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803302981304.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM197803302981304
PMID:415241
Abstract

Medical costs are straining public finances. Direct economic regulation will raise costs, retard beneficial innovation and be increasingly burdensome to physicians. As an alternative, I suggest that the government change financial incentives by creating a system of competing health plans in which physicians and consumers can benefit from using resources wisely. Main proposals consist of changed tax laws, Medicare and Medicaid to subsidize individual premium payments by an amount based on financial and predicted medical need, as well as subsidies usable only for premiums in qualified health insurance or delivery plans operating under rules that include periodic open enrollment, community rating by actuarial category, premium rating by market area and a limit on each person's out-of pocket costs. Also, efficient systems should be allowed to pass on the full savings to consumers. Finally, incremental changes should be made in the present system to alter it fundamentally, but gradually and voluntarily. Freedom of choice for consumers and physicians should be preserved.

摘要

医疗成本正使公共财政不堪重负。直接的经济监管会增加成本、阻碍有益的创新,且对医生的负担也会越来越重。作为一种替代方案,我建议政府通过创建一个竞争性医疗计划体系来改变财政激励措施,在这个体系中,医生和消费者都能从明智地使用资源中受益。主要提议包括修改税法、医疗保险和医疗补助计划,根据经济状况和预测的医疗需求为个人保费支付提供补贴,以及仅用于符合条件的医疗保险或按包括定期开放参保、按精算类别进行社区评级、按市场区域进行保费评级以及对个人自付费用设限等规则运营的医疗服务提供计划的保费补贴。此外,应允许高效的体系将全部节省的费用让利给消费者。最后,应对现行体系进行渐进式变革,从根本上改变它,但要循序渐进且出于自愿。应保留消费者和医生的选择自由。

相似文献

1
Consumer-Choice Health plan (second of two parts). A national-health-insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector.消费者选择健康计划(两部分中的第二部分)。一项基于私营部门规范竞争的全国医疗保险提案。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 30;298(13):709-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803302981304.
2
Consumer-choice health plan (first of two parts). Inflation and inequity in health care today: alternatives for cost control and an analysis of proposals for national health insurance.消费者选择健康保险计划(两部分中的第一部分)。当今医疗保健中的通货膨胀与不公平:成本控制的替代方案及国家健康保险提案分析。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Mar 23;298(12):650-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197803232981204.
3
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
4
Expanding Medicare and employer plans to achieve universal health insurance.扩大医疗保险和雇主计划以实现全民医疗保险。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2525-8.
5
An American approach to health system reform.美国的医疗体系改革之路。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2537-40.
6
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
7
The economics of financing medical care: a review of the literature.医疗保健融资的经济学:文献综述
Inquiry. 1972 Dec;9(4):3-19.
8
A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy (1).
N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 5;320(1):29-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200106.
9
Whither private health insurance? Self-destruction or rebirth?私人医疗保险何去何从?自我毁灭还是重生?
Front Health Serv Manage. 1992 Fall;9(1):5-31; discussion 46-7.
10
Health reform: the good, the bad, and the bottom line.医疗改革:好处、坏处与底线。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):115-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.115.

引用本文的文献

1
Should administrative costs in health insurance be included in the risk-equalization? An analysis of five countries.医疗保险中的管理费用是否应纳入风险调整?对五个国家的分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1437-1453. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01436-y. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Persistent inequitable design and implementation of patient portals for users at the margins.持续存在的不平等设计和实施患者门户,导致边缘用户无法使用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):276-283. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa273.
3
Does the chronically ill population in the Netherlands switch their health insurer as often as the general population? Empirical evidence from a nationwide survey study.
荷兰的慢性病患者是否像一般人群一样经常更换健康保险公司?一项全国性调查研究的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 5;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05228-z.
4
Hospital Choice for Cataract Treatments: The Winner Takes Most.白内障治疗的医院选择:赢家通吃。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):1120-1129. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.77.
5
Selection Incentives for Health Insurers in the Presence of Sophisticated Risk Adjustment.存在复杂风险调整时,对健康保险公司的选择激励。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Dec;77(6):584-595. doi: 10.1177/1077558719825982. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Risk equalization in competitive health insurance markets: Identifying healthy individuals on the basis of multiple-year low spending.竞争性健康保险市场中的风险均衡:基于多年低支出识别健康个体。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):455-465. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13065. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Failure to pay for social health insurance premiums: Acts of protest or desperation?未缴纳社会医疗保险费用:是抗议行为还是绝望之举?
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Feb 7;2:127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.02.001. eCollection 2015.
8
Alain Enthoven: An Outspoken Champion for the Prepaid Group Practice.阿兰·恩托文:预付制团体医疗模式的直言不讳的拥护者。
Perm J. 2004 Summer;8(3):31-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/04.927.
9
Risk adjustment in aging societies.老龄化社会中的风险调整
Health Econ Rev. 2014 Dec;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13561-014-0007-5. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
10
Risk Protection, Service Use, and Health Outcomes under Colombia's Health Insurance Program for the Poor.哥伦比亚针对贫困人口的医疗保险计划下的风险保护、服务利用及健康结果
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Oct;5(4):61-91. doi: 10.1257/app.5.4.61.