• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Benchmarking co-folding methods to predict the structures of covalent protein-ligand complexes.

作者信息

Zhang Tong-Han, Zhu Jin-Tao, Huang Zhi-Xian, Xie Juan, Pei Jian-Feng, Lai Lu-Hua

机构信息

Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Center for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

出版信息

Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2026 Jan 12. doi: 10.1038/s41401-025-01721-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41401-025-01721-5
PMID:41526649
Abstract

Targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) are emerging as a new modality in drug discovery because of their strong binding affinity and prolonged target engagement. However, the rational design of TCIs remains a significant challenge and is hindered by the lack of methods that accurately predict the structures of covalent protein-ligand complexes. Recent advances in co-folding approaches have made substantial strides in modeling complex biomolecular structures. Despite significant progress, their performance profiles for predicting the structures of covalent protein-ligand complexes remain largely unexplored because of the absence of rigorous benchmarks. Here, we introduce CoFD-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset comprising 218 recently resolved covalent complexes designed to systematically evaluate both classical docking methods (AutoDock-GPU, CovDock, and GNINA) and deep learning co-folding models (AlphaFold3 (AF3), Chai-1, and Boltz-1x). Our results demonstrate that co-folding methods achieve superior ligand RMSD accuracy and protein-ligand interaction recovery. However, their performance markedly declines for novel pocket-ligand pairs. In contrast, classical docking methods exhibit stable but modest performance, which is primarily limited by target conformations. Furthermore, computational efficiency evaluations show that co-folding methods are slower than classical approaches, posing challenges for large-scale predictions. We also reveal that AF3 has the potential to identify native covalent residues through noncovalent co-folding, with a ligand RMSD comparable to that of covalent co-folding. These findings offer a possible route to explore covalent binding without prior specification of reactive residues, which are often unknown in real-world scenarios. Our study provides crucial insights and new opportunities for future co-folding-based TCI design, informing future model applications and improvements. CoFD-Bench offers rigorous evaluation criteria, diverse docking scenarios, and various methodological baselines, positioning it as an important benchmark for future model development and assessment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Benchmarking co-folding methods to predict the structures of covalent protein-ligand complexes.
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2026 Jan 12. doi: 10.1038/s41401-025-01721-5.
2
Large scale prospective evaluation of co-folding across 557 Mac1-ligand complexes and three virtual screens.
bioRxiv. 2025 Dec 29:2025.12.25.696505. doi: 10.64898/2025.12.25.696505.
3
Evaluation of De Novo Deep Learning Models on the Protein-Sugar Interactome.蛋白质-糖相互作用组上新深度学习模型的评估
bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 6:2025.09.02.673778. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.02.673778.
4
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases.
J Chem Inf Model. 2026 Jan 12;66(1):731-743. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02481. Epub 2025 Dec 22.
5
A comprehensive benchmarking of the AlphaFold3 for predicting biomacromolecules and their interactions.
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Nov 1;26(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf616.
6
Benchmarking Cofolding Methods for Molecular Glue Ternary Structure Prediction.
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Oct 27;65(20):11136-11148. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01860. Epub 2025 Oct 10.
7
PepPCBench is a Comprehensive Benchmarking Framework for Protein-Peptide Complex Structure Prediction.PepPCBench是一个用于蛋白质-肽复合物结构预测的综合基准测试框架。
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Aug 25;65(16):8497-8513. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01084. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
8
Benchmarking all-atom biomolecular structure prediction with FoldBench.
Nat Commun. 2025 Dec 4;17(1):442. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67127-3.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.共价对接工具的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Jul 23;58(7):1441-1458. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00228. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.基于相似性的配体对接和结合亲和力预测的非线性评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Nov 25;53(11):3097-112. doi: 10.1021/ci400510e. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking Cofolding Methods for Molecular Glue Ternary Structure Prediction.
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Oct 27;65(20):11136-11148. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01860. Epub 2025 Oct 10.
2
AlphaFold3 for Noncanonical Cyclic Peptide Modeling: Hierarchical Benchmarking Reveals Accuracy and Practical Guidelines.用于非经典环肽建模的AlphaFold3:分层基准测试揭示了准确性和实用指南。
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Sep 22;65(18):9777-9789. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01393. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
3
Advancing Covalent Ligand and Drug Discovery beyond Cysteine.超越半胱氨酸推进共价配体与药物发现
Chem Rev. 2025 Jul 23;125(14):6653-6684. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00001. Epub 2025 May 22.
4
Assessing interaction recovery of predicted protein-ligand poses.评估预测的蛋白质-配体构象的相互作用恢复情况。
J Cheminform. 2025 May 19;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-01011-6.
5
GNINA 1.3: the next increment in molecular docking with deep learning.GNINA 1.3:深度学习在分子对接方面的下一次进展。
J Cheminform. 2025 Mar 2;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-00973-x.
6
Covalent-Allosteric Inhibitors: Do We Get the Best of Both Worlds?共价变构抑制剂:我们能否两全其美?
J Med Chem. 2025 Feb 27;68(4):4040-4052. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02760. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
7
Advancing protein structure prediction beyond AlphaFold2.
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2025 Feb;90:102985. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2025.102985. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
8
Targeted Covalent Modification Strategies for Drugging the Undruggable Targets.靶向共价修饰策略:用于使不可成药靶点成药
Chem Rev. 2025 Jan 22;125(2):1191-1253. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00745. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
9
AlphaFold3 versus experimental structures: assessment of the accuracy in ligand-bound G protein-coupled receptors.AlphaFold3与实验结构:配体结合型G蛋白偶联受体准确性评估
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2025 Apr;46(4):1111-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41401-024-01429-y. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
10
CovalentInDB 2.0: an updated comprehensive database for structure-based and ligand-based covalent inhibitor design and screening.共价抑制剂数据库2.0:用于基于结构和基于配体的共价抑制剂设计与筛选的更新综合数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Jan 6;53(D1):D1322-D1327. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae946.