Suppr超能文献

一种用于预测呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿呼吸护理水平的临床评分。

A clinical score for predicting the level of respiratory care in infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Peckham G J, Schulman J, Pereira G R, Shutack J G

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1979 Dec;18(12):716-20. doi: 10.1177/000992287901801201.

Abstract

A scoring system was developed to predict the need for transferring infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) from community hospitals to specialized respiratory care centers. Five clinical and laboratory determinations (birthweight, clinical RDS score, FI02, PCO2 and pH) recorded from 100 infants with RDS during one year were utilized in a score with values ranging from 0 to 10. Application of the score to 159 infants with RDS during the following year showed that: (1) 73 per cent of infants scoring less than or equal to 3 received only oxygen by hood; (2) 75 per cent of infants scoring 4--5 required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); and (3) 87 per cent of infants scoring greater than or equal to 6 needed mechanical ventilation (7V). Mean scores were significantly different (p less than 0.02) for each type of respiratory therapy employed: oxygen by hood (2.30 +/- 0.19 S.E.M.); CPAP (4.27 +/- 0.16 S.E.M.); MV (6.72 +/- 0.25 S.E.M.). The accuracy and simplicity of the score make it valuable for the physician in the community hospital to assist in deciding when to transfer a neonate with RDS for more intensive respiratory therapy.

摘要

开发了一种评分系统,以预测呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)婴儿从社区医院转至专业呼吸护理中心的必要性。对100例RDS婴儿在一年期间记录的五项临床和实验室指标(出生体重、临床RDS评分、FiO₂、PCO₂和pH)用于一个分值范围为0至10的评分系统。次年将该评分系统应用于159例RDS婴儿,结果显示:(1)评分小于或等于3分的婴儿中,73%仅通过面罩吸氧;(2)评分4 - 5分的婴儿中,75%需要持续气道正压通气(CPAP);(3)评分大于或等于6分的婴儿中,87%需要机械通气(MV)。采用的每种呼吸治疗方式的平均评分有显著差异(p<0.02):面罩吸氧(2.30±0.19标准误);CPAP(4.27±0.16标准误);MV(6.72±0.25标准误)。该评分系统的准确性和简便性使其对社区医院的医生在协助决定何时将患有RDS的新生儿转至更强化的呼吸治疗时具有重要价值。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验