Suppr超能文献

通过静脉注射聚合γ球蛋白在被动皮肤过敏反应部位引发的出血反应。

Haemorrhagic reactions elicited at sites of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis by the intravenous injection of aggregated gamma-globulin.

作者信息

Bier O G, Passos H C, Siqueira M

出版信息

Immunology. 1968 Feb;14(2):291-8.

Abstract

In guinea-pigs injected intradermally with a small amount of antibody and challenged 2 hours later, by the intravenous route, with a mixture of homologous antigen and aggregated γ-globulin, haemorrhagic reactions of the Arthus type develop at the sites of intradermal sensitization. This effect was obtained with γ-globulins of different species (human, rabbit and horse) by using different techniques for aggregation (heat, mercaptoethanol—urea and bis-diazobenzidine) and was always correlated with the ability of the aggregated globulin to fix complement. Fluorescein labelled aggregates of γ-globulin were detectable in the wall of vessels at sensitized sites. In experiments performed with guinea-pig antibodies, the localizing effect was observed only with γ, whereas the γ, Arthus-producing fraction proved completely ineffective. Histamine and histamine liberators are not sufficient for eliciting the effect obtained with sensitizing antibody plus homologous antigen. It is postulated, therefore, that other effects occurring at the site of specific sensitization may also be responsible for the phenomenon.

摘要

给豚鼠皮内注射少量抗体,2小时后经静脉途径用同源抗原与聚合γ球蛋白的混合物进行攻击,在皮内致敏部位会出现阿瑟斯型出血反应。通过不同的聚合技术(加热、巯基乙醇-尿素和双偶氮联苯胺),利用不同物种(人、兔和马)的γ球蛋白可获得这种效应,且该效应始终与聚合球蛋白固定补体的能力相关。在致敏部位的血管壁中可检测到荧光素标记的γ球蛋白聚集体。在用豚鼠抗体进行的实验中,仅γ球蛋白有定位作用,而产生阿瑟斯反应的γ球蛋白部分则完全无效。组胺和组胺释放剂不足以引发用致敏抗体加同源抗原所获得的效应。因此推测,在特异性致敏部位发生的其他效应也可能是该现象的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9c/1409289/53a74b300016/immunology00397-0150-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验