Simpson G M, Cooper T B, Lee J H, Young M A
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Mar 1;56(2):225-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00431855.
The intramuscular and oral forms of loxapine succinate were compared in their clinical, side effect, and blood level characteristics in ten hospitalized chronic schizophrenic patients. The first phase of the study determined the single dose that produced moderate sedation (i.e., the sedation threshold), and this dose was essentially the same for the two forms. Continuous administration of the two forms using the individualized sedation threshold dosage also failed to indicate any clinical or side effect differences in the two forms. The blood level characteristics, however, did differ between the two forms. The kinetic studies indicated that there was a larger are under the loxapine curve with the intramuscular form than with the oral form, while the 8-OH loxapine area was larger with the oral form. The steady-state studies also showed that the i.m. form had higher loxapine levels than the oral form. The significance of these findings, both clinically and in terms of the relative activity of loxapine and its metabolites, is discussed.
对10名住院慢性精神分裂症患者的琥珀酸洛沙平肌肉注射剂型和口服剂型的临床、副作用及血药浓度特征进行了比较。研究的第一阶段确定了产生中度镇静作用的单剂量(即镇静阈值),两种剂型的该剂量基本相同。使用个体化镇静阈值剂量持续给予两种剂型,也未显示出两种剂型在临床或副作用方面存在任何差异。然而,两种剂型的血药浓度特征确实有所不同。动力学研究表明,肌肉注射剂型的洛沙平曲线下面积比口服剂型大,而口服剂型的8-羟基洛沙平面积更大。稳态研究还表明,肌肉注射剂型的洛沙平水平高于口服剂型。本文讨论了这些发现的临床意义以及洛沙平及其代谢产物相对活性方面的意义。