Winterbauer R H, Turck M, Petersdorf R G
J Clin Invest. 1967 Jan;46(1):21-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI105507.
Stool carrier rates of Escherichia coli serogroups 4, 6, and 75 were determined on admission and discharge for 190 patients. Persons who were in the hospital 3 weeks or longer had an intestinal carrier rate of 46% compared to a rate of 28% in individuals who had no recent hospital contact. Treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics increased the susceptibility for acquisition of certain specific serologic groups. This was apparently not related to replacement of sensitive E. coli by drug-resistant forms. Studies were made to determine the environmental source for colonization of hospitalized patients and the risk of urinary infection in stool carriers of these strains. A survey of inanimate objects of medical and urological wards demonstrated infrequent isolation of 04, 06, and 075, indicating that extraintestinal foci were an unlikely source for hospital-acquired E. coli. Hemagglutination titers with determination of group-specific O antibody failed to demonstrate any deficiency in hospitalized patients who became colonized with certain coliforms. Similarly, no significant deficit in group-specific serum antibody was found in patients who were community carriers of E. coli 04, 06, or 075. Despite a high rate of acquisition of E. coli serogroups 4, 6, and 75 in the stools of hospitalized patients, only those patients undergoing urinary tract manipulation developed bacteriuria.
对190例患者入院时和出院时的大肠杆菌血清群4、6和75的粪便携带率进行了测定。住院3周或更长时间的患者肠道携带率为46%,而近期无医院接触史的个体携带率为28%。使用广谱抗生素治疗增加了获得某些特定血清群的易感性。这显然与耐药形式取代敏感大肠杆菌无关。开展研究以确定住院患者定植的环境来源以及这些菌株粪便携带者发生尿路感染的风险。对内科和泌尿科病房的无生命物体进行的一项调查显示,很少分离出04、06和075,这表明肠外病灶不太可能是医院获得性大肠杆菌的来源。通过测定群特异性O抗体的血凝滴度,未能证明感染某些大肠菌的住院患者存在任何缺陷。同样,在大肠杆菌04、06或075的社区携带者患者中,未发现群特异性血清抗体有明显缺陷。尽管住院患者粪便中大肠杆菌血清群4、6和75的获得率很高,但只有那些接受尿路操作的患者发生了菌尿。