Yudkin P, Frumar A M, Anderson A B, Turnbull A C
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Apr;86(4):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11252.x.
The labour, delivery and state of the newborn were compared retrospectively in a group of women who had labour induced and a group who started labour spontaneously. There were 200 women at term in each group, individually matched for age, parity and social class and with no medical or obstetric complications prior to labour. The induced group showed a higher incidence of epidural anaesthesia, fetal monitoring and operative delivery. Sixty had forceps deliveries and five had Caesarean sections compared with two forceps deliveries and no Caesarean sections in the 'spontaneous onset' group. The higher incidence of operative deliveries in the induced group was not fully explained by the excess of epidurals and fetal monitoring received. More of the babies born after an induced labour had endotracheal intubation during resuscitation.
对一组引产的妇女和一组自然发动分娩的妇女的分娩过程、新生儿状况进行了回顾性比较。每组有200名足月妇女，在年龄、产次和社会阶层方面进行了个体匹配，且分娩前无医学或产科并发症。引产组硬膜外麻醉、胎儿监护和手术分娩的发生率较高。引产组有60例产钳助产和5例剖宫产，而自然发动分娩组有2例产钳助产且无剖宫产。引产组手术分娩发生率较高，这不能完全用硬膜外麻醉和胎儿监护过多来解释。引产分娩后出生的婴儿在复苏过程中更多地需要气管插管。
