Suppr超能文献

肾上腺素能刺激对冠状动脉、皮肤血管和肌肉血管的直接作用差异。

Differences in direct effects of adrenergic stimuli on coronary, cutaneous, and muscular vessels.

作者信息

Mark A L, Abboud F M, Schmid P G, Heistad D D, Mayer H E

出版信息

J Clin Invest. 1972 Feb;51(2):279-87. doi: 10.1172/JCI106812.

Abstract

Direct effects of adrenergic stimuli on coronary vessels in dogs were compared with effects on vessels to skin (hind paw) and skeletal muscle (gracilis muscle) after intravenous administration of practolol (2 mg/kg), a selective myocardial beta receptor blocker which minimized indirect effects of myocardial stimulation on coronary vascular resistance. The left circumflex coronary, cranial tibial, and gracilis arteries were perfused separately but simultaneously at constant flow. Perfusion pressures, left ventricular pressure and dP/dt. and heart rate were recorded. Changes in perfusion pressure to each bed reflected changes in vascular resistance. The direct constrictor effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation, norepinephrine and phenylephrine on coronary vessels were minimal compared with effects on cutaneous and muscular vessels. Subsequent blockade of vascular beta receptors did not augment the constrictor responses. Angiotensin, a nonadrenergic stimulus, produced striking coronary vasoconstriction which exceeded that in skin and approximated that in muscle. These results suggests that there is a paucity of alpha adrenergic receptors in coronary vessels compared to cutaneous and muscular vessels. Direct dilator responses to isoproterenol were similar in coronary and cutaneous vessels, but were greater in muscular vessels. Responses to glyceryl trinitrate, a nonadrenergic dilator, also were greater in skeletal muscle. Therefore, differences in effects of isoproterenol on the three beds may reflect differences in reactivity to dilator stimuli rather than differences in the density of beta receptors. In contrast to norepinephrine, the predominant direct effect of epinephrine on coronary vessels was dilatation mediated through activation of vascular beta receptors. A constrictor effect caused by stimulation of alpha receptors was unmasked by propranolol.Finally, the order of potency of agonists in stimulating coronary vascular beta receptors and the demonstration of selective beta receptor blockade with practolol suggest that beta receptors in coronary vessels resemble those in peripheral vessels more than those in myocardium.

摘要

在静脉注射心得宁(2毫克/千克)后,比较了肾上腺素能刺激对犬冠状动脉血管的直接作用与对皮肤(后爪)和骨骼肌(股薄肌)血管的作用。心得宁是一种选择性心肌β受体阻滞剂,可将心肌刺激对冠状动脉血管阻力的间接作用降至最低。左旋冠状动脉、胫前动脉和股薄肌动脉分别但同时以恒定流量灌注。记录灌注压力、左心室压力和dP/dt以及心率。各床灌注压力的变化反映了血管阻力的变化。与对皮肤和肌肉血管的作用相比,交感神经刺激、去甲肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素对冠状动脉血管的直接收缩作用最小。随后对血管β受体的阻断并未增强收缩反应。血管紧张素,一种非肾上腺素能刺激物,引起显著的冠状动脉血管收缩,超过皮肤血管的收缩,接近肌肉血管的收缩。这些结果表明,与皮肤和肌肉血管相比,冠状动脉血管中α肾上腺素能受体较少。异丙肾上腺素对冠状动脉和皮肤血管的直接舒张反应相似,但在肌肉血管中更大。对非肾上腺素能扩张剂硝酸甘油的反应在骨骼肌中也更大。因此,异丙肾上腺素对这三个床的作用差异可能反映了对扩张剂刺激的反应性差异,而不是β受体密度的差异。与去甲肾上腺素相反,肾上腺素对冠状动脉血管的主要直接作用是通过激活血管β受体介导的舒张作用。普萘洛尔可揭示由α受体刺激引起的收缩作用。最后,激动剂刺激冠状动脉血管β受体的效力顺序以及心得宁对β受体选择性阻断的证明表明,冠状动脉血管中的β受体与外周血管中的β受体更相似,而不是与心肌中的β受体更相似。

相似文献

8
Coronary vascular sympathetic beta-receptor innervation.冠状血管交感β受体神经支配。
Am J Physiol. 1976 Jun;230(6):1569-76. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.230.6.1569.

引用本文的文献

2
Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.冠状动脉血流的调节
Compr Physiol. 2017 Mar 16;7(2):321-382. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160016.
4
Neuronal control of coronary blood flow.冠状动脉血流的神经控制。
Basic Res Cardiol. 1995 Mar-Apr;90(2):142-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00789444.
9
Regulation of myocardial oxygen delivery.心肌氧输送的调节
Intensive Care Med. 1990;16 Suppl 2:S157-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01785246.

本文引用的文献

2
INFLUENCE OF THE CARDIAC NERVES ON CORONARY RESISTANCE.心脏神经对冠状动脉阻力的影响。
Am J Physiol. 1965 Apr;208:763-9. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1965.208.4.763.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验