Radford D J, Julian D G
Br Med J. 1974 Aug 24;3(5929):504-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5929.504.
Out of a pacemaker clinic population of 182 patients 21 (11.5%) were found to have the sick sinus syndrome. Their ages ranged from 30 to 80 years and averaged 62. Ischaemic heart disease was more commonly an aetiological factor than in patients with chronic atrioventricular heart block. Other aetiologies were familial cardiomyopathy, postcardiac surgery, and dystrophia myotonica.Cardioversion before pacemaker insertion was a hazardous procedure. After insertion the occurrence of tachycardias and the need for drug therapy were reduced. One patient no longer required a pacemaker once atrial fibrillation became established.A high incidence of cerebral embolization was observed and the use of anticoagulant drugs therefore merits serious consideration.Failure of inhibition of demand-type pacemakers occurred in two patients. Two patients who exhibited competition with fixed-rate pacemakers died. Two patients were treated with electrodes surgically implanted on the right atrium. It is suggested that fixed-rate pacemakers may be contra-indicated and that sequential atrioventricular demand pacing is theoretically ideal.
在一家起搏器诊所的182名患者中,发现21例(11.5%)患有病态窦房结综合征。他们的年龄在30至80岁之间,平均年龄为62岁。与慢性房室传导阻滞患者相比,缺血性心脏病更常作为病因。其他病因包括家族性心肌病、心脏手术后和强直性肌营养不良。在植入起搏器之前进行心脏复律是一种危险的操作。植入后,心动过速的发生率和药物治疗的需求降低。一旦房颤确立,有一名患者不再需要起搏器。观察到脑栓塞的发生率很高,因此使用抗凝药物值得认真考虑。两名患者出现按需型起搏器抑制失败。两名与固定频率起搏器竞争的患者死亡。两名患者接受了右心房电极手术植入治疗。建议固定频率起搏器可能存在禁忌,理论上顺序房室按需起搏是理想的。