Warren W D, Rudman D, Millikan W, Galambos J T, Salam A A, Smith R B
Ann Surg. 1974 Oct;180(4):573-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197410000-00022.
Portasystemic encephalopathy has been a major deterent to the utilization of total or non-selective shunts. A procedure to determine the maximum rate of urea synthesis (MRUS) has been developed and a depression in the ability to synthesize urea has been shown to correlate closely with the development of encephalopathy. Utilizing this procedure and a modified ammonium tolerance curve, a controlled comparison was instituted between selective and non-selective shunts. Following a non-selective or total shunt, there was a definite deterioration in both the MRUS and the ammonium chloride tolerance curve which was accompanied by a high rate of clinical encephalopathy. In marked contrast, the selective shunt, which maintains portal venous perfusion of the liver, showed little or no change in the MRUS and the ammonium chloride tolerance curve following the selective shunt and there was a very low incidence of encephalopathy. The difference between the non-selective and selective shunt in maintenance of urea synthesis, metabolism of ammonium chloride, and the development of clinical encephalopathy show the selective shunt procedure to be definitively superior in this regard.
门体性脑病一直是阻碍全分流术或非选择性分流术应用的主要因素。一种测定尿素合成最大速率(MRUS)的方法已经开发出来,并且已证明尿素合成能力的降低与脑病的发展密切相关。利用该方法和改良的氯化铵耐量曲线,对选择性分流术和非选择性分流术进行了对照比较。在进行非选择性或全分流术后,MRUS和氯化铵耐量曲线均出现明显恶化,并伴有较高的临床脑病发生率。与之形成鲜明对比的是,保留肝脏门静脉灌注的选择性分流术在术后MRUS和氯化铵耐量曲线几乎没有变化,且脑病发生率极低。非选择性分流术和选择性分流术在维持尿素合成、氯化铵代谢以及临床脑病发展方面的差异表明,选择性分流术在这方面明显更具优势。