Suppr超能文献

体积描记法与脉冲多普勒血流测定法的比较。

Comparison of plethysmographic methods with pulsed Döppler blood flowmetry.

作者信息

Levy B I, Valladares W R, Ghaem A, Martineaud J P

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1979 Jun;236(6):H899-903. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1979.236.6.H899.

Abstract

Hand blood flow was measured at rest, with local warming, and with local cooling. Three methods were simultaneously used: water plethysmography (WP), mercury-in-rubber strain gauge plethysmography (SG), and pulsed Döppler flowmetry (D). Of these, water plethysmography is the most sensitive and accurate; strain gauge plethysmography is simpler but less accurate; and pulsed Döppler flowmetry precisely measures instantaneous arterial blood flow without venous occlusion.

摘要

分别在静息状态、局部升温以及局部降温时测量手部血流量。同时使用了三种方法:水容积描记法(WP)、水银橡胶应变计容积描记法(SG)和脉冲多普勒血流仪(D)。其中,水容积描记法最为灵敏和准确;应变计容积描记法更简便但准确性稍差;脉冲多普勒血流仪无需静脉阻塞即可精确测量瞬时动脉血流量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验