Airhart J, Vidrich A, Khairallah E A
Biochem J. 1974 Jun;140(3):539-45. doi: 10.1042/bj1400539.
The concept that a general intracellular pool serves as the sole precursor of amino acids for protein biosynthesis has been vigorously debated in recent years. To help resolve this controversy, we followed the distribution of intraperitoneally administered [(3)H]valine in the tRNA and the extracellular and intracellular compartments of rat liver. The specific radioactivity of the valine released from isolated tRNA was 2-3 times higher than that of intracellular valine, suggesting that the intracellular pool cannot be the sole precursor of amino acids used for charging tRNA. In addition, the specific radioactivity of the tRNA was only half that of the extracellular valine. Therefore it is unlikely that the valyl-tRNA is charged exclusively with amino acids derived from the extracellular pool. A model is proposed which stipulates that both extracellular and intracellular amino acids contribute to a restricted compartment that funnels amino acids towards protein biosynthesis.
近年来,关于一个通用的细胞内池作为蛋白质生物合成中氨基酸的唯一前体这一概念一直存在激烈争论。为了帮助解决这一争议,我们追踪了腹腔注射的[(3)H]缬氨酸在大鼠肝脏的tRNA以及细胞外和细胞内区室中的分布。从分离的tRNA释放的缬氨酸的比放射性比细胞内缬氨酸的比放射性高2 - 3倍,这表明细胞内池不可能是用于tRNA充电的氨基酸的唯一前体。此外,tRNA的比放射性仅为细胞外缬氨酸的一半。因此,缬氨酰 - tRNA不太可能仅由来自细胞外池的氨基酸充电。提出了一个模型,该模型规定细胞外和细胞内氨基酸都对一个有限的区室有贡献,该区室将氨基酸导向蛋白质生物合成。