Wood M S, Seeds R S
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Oct;62(4):374-84.
The Reference Department of The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Library has offered SDI service to the faculty for over three and one-half years. This study traces the development of SDI services from a manual Current Awareness Service (CAS), with the incorporation of Index Medicus photocopies, to the National Library of Medicine's SDILINE (Selective Dissemination of Information On-LINE). Over 24% of the Medical Center's faculty currently receive SDILINE service. Through questionnaires, the two systems are evaluated and compared. There was 100% return on both questionnaires. Both the manual CAS and SDILINE were favorably received by the faculty, but SDILINE was chosen unanimously as the preferred service. A subscription fee for SDILINE did not significantly affect the system's use. Conclusions reached through the questionnaires indicate that constant evaluation of subject profiles and interaction between the librarian and the user are necessary for optimum use of any SDI service.
米尔顿·S·赫尔希医疗中心图书馆参考部为教职员工提供定题情报服务(SDI)已超过三年半。本研究追溯了SDI服务从手工现况报道服务(CAS),即结合《医学索引》影印件,发展到美国国立医学图书馆的联机定题情报服务(SDILINE)的过程。目前,该医疗中心超过24%的教职员工接受SDILINE服务。通过问卷调查对这两种系统进行了评估和比较。两份问卷的回收率均为100%。手工CAS和SDILINE都受到了教职员工的好评,但SDILINE被一致选为首选服务。SDILINE的订阅费用对该系统的使用没有显著影响。通过问卷调查得出的结论表明,为了最佳地使用任何SDI服务,有必要不断评估主题概况以及馆员与用户之间的互动。