Greenberg B, Breedlove R, Berger W
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Jan;65(1):22-30.
When a medical library serves both research scientists and practicing physicians, it may be predicted from the results of previous studies that computerized bibliographic search services will show more research and less clinical activity. The present paper reports the results of a statistical analysis of professional use of the National Library of Medicine's bibliographic retrieval system. MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System on-Line), at a large medical school library. Results indicate that (1) demand for MEDLINE service is primarily research oriented; (2) frequency of use bears a relationship to rank and departmental affiliation; (3) broad and comprehensive searches are requested more frequently than searches for specific information; (4) usage shows an interesting curvilinear relationship with age and status of the user; and (5) grant funds and support correlate with the number of searches requested. Implication of these findings are that since clinicians' use of MEDLINE was found to be minimal, information services should be reevaluated in order to assist in meeting their information needs more effectively.
当医学图书馆同时为科研人员和执业医师服务时,根据以往研究结果可以预测,计算机化的书目检索服务将显示出更多的科研活动和更少的临床活动。本文报告了对一所大型医学院图书馆中专业人员使用国立医学图书馆的书目检索系统MEDLINE(医学文献分析与检索联机系统)情况的统计分析结果。结果表明:(1)对MEDLINE服务的需求主要以科研为导向;(2)使用频率与职位和部门归属有关;(3)与查找特定信息相比,更频繁地请求进行广泛而全面的检索;(4)使用情况与用户的年龄和地位呈现出有趣的曲线关系;(5)资助资金和支持与所请求的检索次数相关。这些发现的意义在于,由于发现临床医生对MEDLINE的使用极少,因此应重新评估信息服务,以便更有效地满足他们的信息需求。