• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

堕胎、非婚生育与美国出生率

Abortion, illegitimacy, and the American birth rate.

作者信息

Sklar J, Berkov B

出版信息

Science. 1974 Sep 13;185(4155):909-15. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4155.909.

DOI:10.1126/science.185.4155.909
PMID:4469668
Abstract

In sum, it appears that legal abortion depressed overall fertility, but particularly illegitimate fertility, by giving women an opportunity to terminate their pregnancies when other means of birth control either had not been used or had failed. If legalized abortion had not been available, an estimated additional 39,000 illegitimate babies and 28,000 legitimate babies would have been born in 1971 in the United States. While this makes up a small part of total births (3,500,000), the illegitimate births prevented represent almost onetenth of all out-of-wedlock children born in the country in that year. In addition to preventing these births the legalization of abortion appears to have reduced the incidence of pregnancy-related marriages and thereby may have helped to limit subsequent marital disruption. Finally, legal abortion prevented large numbers of illegal abortions from occurring. Our data indicate that well over half-most likely between two-thirds and three-fourths-of all legal abortions in the United States in 1971 were replacements for illegal abortions. Further declines in illegitimate birth rates for the country as a whole will depend, in considerable part, on the extent to which legal abortion becomes more readily available and more widely used. Theoretically, greater use of efficient contraception could also cause illegitimate fertility to decline. But there are many reasons why women do not use efficient contraception even when they know about it and have access to the materials (25). Even though the use of abortion throughout the nation is now legalized by the Supreme Court decision, this does not necessarily mean that services will in fact be everywhere more readily available. Our interstate analysis suggests that should the liberalization of abortion laws be reversed, not only would there be an upturn in illegal abortions and pregnancy-related marriages, but also a marked rise in illegitimacy, particularly among women who do not have the means to obtain an illegal abortion.

摘要

总之,合法堕胎似乎降低了总体生育率,尤其是非婚生育率,因为它让女性在其他避孕方法未被采用或失败时,有机会终止妊娠。如果没有合法堕胎,据估计1971年美国会多出生约3.9万非婚婴儿和2.8万婚生婴儿。虽然这在总出生数(350万)中占比很小,但被避免的非婚出生数几乎占该年美国所有非婚生子女的十分之一。除了避免这些出生,堕胎合法化似乎还降低了与怀孕相关的婚姻发生率,从而可能有助于减少随后的婚姻破裂。最后,合法堕胎防止了大量非法堕胎的发生。我们的数据表明,1971年美国超过半数——很可能在三分之二到四分之三之间——的合法堕胎是对非法堕胎的替代。整个国家非婚生育率的进一步下降在很大程度上取决于合法堕胎变得更容易获得和更广泛使用的程度。从理论上讲,更多地使用高效避孕措施也可能导致非婚生育率下降。但即使女性了解并能获得高效避孕措施,她们不使用的原因也有很多。尽管最高法院的裁决使全国范围内堕胎合法化,但这并不一定意味着各地的堕胎服务实际上会更容易获得。我们的州际分析表明,如果堕胎法的自由化被逆转,不仅非法堕胎和与怀孕相关的婚姻会增加,非婚生子女率也会显著上升,尤其是在那些没有办法进行非法堕胎的女性中。

相似文献

1
Abortion, illegitimacy, and the American birth rate.堕胎、非婚生育与美国出生率
Science. 1974 Sep 13;185(4155):909-15. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4155.909.
2
Illegal abortion in Latin America.拉丁美洲的非法堕胎。
IPPF Med Bull. 1982 Aug;16(4):1-2.
3
The effects of legal abortion on legitimate and illegitimate birth rates: the California experience.合法堕胎对合法与非法生育率的影响:加利福尼亚州的经验
Stud Fam Plann. 1973 Nov;4(11):281-92.
4
Liberalized abortion and birth rates changes in Baltimore.巴尔的摩堕胎政策放宽与出生率变化
Am J Public Health. 1973 May;63(5):405-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.5.405.
5
The relationship between legal abortion and marriage.
Soc Biol. 1975 Summer;22(2):117-24. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1975.9988156.
6
Family planning services in the United States.美国的计划生育服务。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1975;9(2):124-8.
7
Health benefits of legal abortion: an analysis.合法堕胎的健康益处:一项分析
Plan Parent Rev. 1985 Summer;5(2):24-7.
8
Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States.美国与母婴死亡率相关的计划生育问题。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(2):120-34.
9
Birth, marriage and death in illegitimacy: a study in northern Portugal.非婚生育、非婚结婚与非婚死亡:葡萄牙北部的一项研究
J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Oct;27(4):443-55. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000023051.
10
The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.避孕措施改善对西方国家生育率和堕胎率的潜在影响。
Eur J Popul. 1987 Nov;3(1):7-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01797090.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproductive justice and the pace of change: socioeconomic trends in US infant death rates by legal status of abortion, 1960-1980.生殖正义与变革步伐:1960 - 1980年美国按堕胎法律地位划分的婴儿死亡率的社会经济趋势
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):680-2. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302401. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
2
A Cognitive-Social Model of Fertility Intentions.生育意愿的认知-社会模型。
Popul Dev Rev. 2013 Sep 1;39(3):459-485. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00612.x.
3
Abortion before & after Roe.罗诉韦德案前后的堕胎情况。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):804-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
Fertility effects of abortion and birth control pill access for minors.未成年人堕胎及获取避孕药具对生育能力的影响。
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):817-27. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0026.
5
Roe v Wade and American fertility.罗诉韦德案与美国的生育率
Am J Public Health. 1999 Feb;89(2):199-203. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.199.
6
The impact of induced abortion on black and white birth outcomes in the United States.人工流产对美国黑人和白人出生结局的影响。
Demography. 1987 May;24(2):229-44.
7
The impact of legalized abortion on adolescent childbearing in New York City.纽约市堕胎合法化对青少年生育的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Mar;80(3):273-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.3.273.
8
Legal abortions and trends in age-specific marriage rates.合法堕胎与特定年龄结婚率趋势
Am J Public Health. 1977 Jan;67(1):52-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.1.52.
9
Development of an adolescent maternity project in Rochester, New York.纽约罗切斯特青少年孕产妇项目的开展。
Public Health Rep. 1977 Mar-Apr;92(2):154-9.
10
[Early and late complications following surgical abortion].
Arch Gynecol. 1979 Jul 20;228(1-4):349-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02427511.