Schröter G, Loch R
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979;245(3):317-23.
Strains of a species were divided into two groups according to the number of resistances (less than or equal to 4, greater than or equal to 5) using 10 standard chemotherapeutics regularly examined, the new cephalosporins not being among them. These groups of less than or equal to 4- and greater than or equal to 5-fold resistant strains were compared for each cephalosporin tested (Fig. 1). The most different distributions of zone diameters (of both groups) were seen in Cephalothin, whereas in Cefoxitin and - with little limitations - also in Cefuroxime in the main these distributions did not differ; they covered the same field. The distributions of Cefaclor and Cefamandole took an intermediate position. With respect to the two groups similar observations were made for E. coli, proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella spec. The differences between the two groups were most marked in Klebsiella strains. E. coli exhibited the smallest differences (Fig 1). On the assumption that the distribution of zone diameters reflect that of MIC's it can be concluded that nearly all of the Cefaclor- and Cefamandole-sensitive multiresistant strains have more elevated MIC's than those with only less than or equal to 4 resistances. On the other hand it must not be expected that MIC'S OF Cefoxitin and Cefuroxim are rising in multiresistant strains. It could be demonstrated that the different qualities of the recently introduced cephalosporins revealed in multiresistant strains can be explained by different dependences on mechanisms of Cephalothin-resistance (Fig. 2). This resistance is much more frequent in greater than or equal to 5-fold resistant strains. Recommendations for clinical use derived from these results are discussed.
使用10种常规检测的标准化疗药物,根据耐药性数量(小于或等于4种、大于或等于5种)将一个物种的菌株分为两组,新的头孢菌素不在其中。对每种测试的头孢菌素比较这两组小于或等于4倍和大于或等于5倍耐药菌株(图1)。在头孢噻吩中观察到两组的抑菌圈直径分布差异最大,而在头孢西丁以及在头孢呋辛中(限制较小),主要是这些分布没有差异;它们覆盖相同范围。头孢克洛和头孢孟多的分布处于中间位置。对于大肠杆菌、奇异变形杆菌和克雷伯菌属,在两组中观察到类似情况。两组之间的差异在克雷伯菌菌株中最为明显。大肠杆菌表现出的差异最小(图1)。假设抑菌圈直径的分布反映了最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的分布,可以得出结论,几乎所有对头孢克洛和头孢孟多敏感的多重耐药菌株的MIC都比那些只有小于或等于4种耐药性的菌株更高。另一方面,不能预期多重耐药菌株中头孢西丁和头孢呋辛的MIC会升高。可以证明,在多重耐药菌株中显示的最近引入的头孢菌素的不同特性可以通过对头孢噻吩耐药机制的不同依赖性来解释(图2)。这种耐药性在大于或等于5倍耐药菌株中更为常见。讨论了从这些结果得出的临床使用建议。