Suppr超能文献

[单侧和双侧休克疗法:作用机制(作者译)]

[Unilateral and bilateral shock therapy: mechanism of action (author's transl)].

作者信息

Ottosson J O

出版信息

Encephale. 1979;5(5 Suppl):617-25.

PMID:44867
Abstract

The unilateral and bilateral therapy differ in psycho-organic effects but have the same antidepressive efficiency. This is due to the facts that the organic effects are mainly caused by the electrical current whereas the antidepressive effect is dependent on the seizure activity. Compared to the bilateral treatment, unilateral gives reduced confusion, anterograde and retrograde amnesia as well as reduced experience of memory impairment. The difference is explained by a lower density of current in the brain. The unilateral treatment should be the treatment to be chosen. The antidepressive action of ECT fits the amine hypothesis, ECT causes a sustained increase of the synthesis of norepinephrine and of the sensitivity of amine receptors and creates conditions for alleviating both "low-output" and "low-sensitivity" depression. The antidepressive action is probably mediated by release of hypothalamic neurohormones.

摘要

单侧治疗和双侧治疗在心理-器质性效应方面有所不同,但抗抑郁效果相同。这是因为器质性效应主要由电流引起,而抗抑郁效果取决于癫痫发作活动。与双侧治疗相比,单侧治疗导致的意识模糊、顺行性和逆行性遗忘以及记忆障碍体验减少。这种差异可以用大脑中较低的电流密度来解释。应选择单侧治疗。电休克疗法的抗抑郁作用符合胺假说,电休克疗法会导致去甲肾上腺素合成持续增加以及胺受体敏感性增加,并为缓解“低输出”和“低敏感性”抑郁症创造条件。抗抑郁作用可能是由下丘脑神经激素的释放介导的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验