Pittendrigh C S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2734-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2734.
It is an established fact that circadian rhythmicity is often somehow involved in the physiology of photoperiodic induction. It is shown, however, that there are three possible ways in which such rhythmicity could be involved. For the most part available data are inadequate to discriminate among these three roles, only one of which is covered by "Bünning's Hypothesis." Emphasis is given to a previously ignored possibility in which circadian organization is involved in photoperiodism"ut not as the clock responsible for the time-measurement. The meaning of circadian surfaces and their bearing on the interpretation of a widely used experimental protocol is developed.
昼夜节律常常以某种方式参与光周期诱导的生理学过程,这是一个既定事实。然而,研究表明,这种节律可能通过三种方式参与其中。在很大程度上,现有数据不足以区分这三种作用,其中只有一种作用涵盖在“比宁假说”中。重点讨论了一种先前被忽视的可能性,即昼夜节律组织参与光周期现象,但并非作为负责时间测量的时钟。阐述了昼夜节律表面的含义及其对一种广泛使用的实验方案解释的影响。