Suppr超能文献

Clinical comparison of maphenide and silver sulphadiazine.

作者信息

Pegg S P, Ramsay K, Meldrum L, Laundy M

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(1):95-101. doi: 10.3109/02844317909013031.

Abstract

A series of 645 consecutive burn injuries are analysed. There were 175 patients in the control group, 156 in the Maphenide (Sulfamylon) group and 314 in the Silver Sulphadiazine (S. S. D.) group. The Maphenide group and S.S.D. group are compared statistically with the control group. S.S.D. proved superior in relation to clinical infection rate and culture rate in reduction of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Other culture rates were analysed. There were significant reductions in both groups for E. coli and Candida albicans. Pneumonias were significantly increased in both groups and the mortality rate reduced with S.S.D. Overall S.S.D. gave better results than Maphenide.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of maphenide and silver sulphadiazine.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(1):95-101. doi: 10.3109/02844317909013031.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in burns.烧伤的抗生素预防与治疗
J Hosp Infect. 1985 Sep;6 Suppl B:59-66. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(85)80086-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of drugs in management of burns.
Drugs. 1982 Sep;24(3):256-60. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198224030-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验