Kooistra J, Venema G
J Bacteriol. 1974 Sep;119(3):705-17. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.3.705-717.1974.
A transformation-deficient strain of Haemophilus influenzae (efficiency of transformation 10(4)-fold less than that of the wild type), designated TD24, was isolated by selection for sensitivity to mitomycin C. In its properties the mutant was equivalent to recA type mutants of Escherichia coli. The TD24 mutation was linked with the str-r marker (about 30%) and only weakly linked with the nov-r2.5 marker. The uptake of donor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was normal in the TD24 strain, but no molecules with recombinant-type activity (molecules carrying both the donor and the resident marker) were formed. In the mutant the intracellular presynaptic fate of the donor DNA was the same as that in the transformation-proficient (wild-type) strain, and the radioactive label of the donor DNA associated covalently with the recipient chromosome in about the same quantity as in the wild type. However, many fewer donor atoms were associated with segments of the mutant's recipient chromosome as compared with segments of the wild-type chromosome. In the mutant the association was accompanied by complete loss of donor marker activity. The lack of donor marker activity of the donor-recipient complex of DNA isolated from the mutant was not due to lack of uptake of the complex by the second recipient and its inability to associate with the second recipient's chromosome. Because the number of donor-atom-carrying resident molecules was higher than could be accounted for by the lengths of presynaptic donor molecules, we favor the idea that the association of donor DNA atoms with the mutant chromosome results from local DNA synthesis rather than from dispersive integration of donor DNA by recombination.
通过选择对丝裂霉素C敏感,分离出一株转化缺陷型流感嗜血杆菌(转化效率比野生型低10^4倍),命名为TD24。该突变体的特性与大肠杆菌的recA类型突变体相当。TD24突变与str-r标记连锁(约30%),与nov-r2.5标记仅弱连锁。TD24菌株中供体脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)的摄取正常,但未形成具有重组型活性的分子(携带供体和受体标记的分子)。在该突变体中,供体DNA的细胞内突触前命运与转化 proficient(野生型)菌株相同,并且供体DNA的放射性标记与受体染色体共价结合的量与野生型大致相同。然而,与野生型染色体片段相比,与突变体受体染色体片段相关的供体原子要少得多。在突变体中,这种结合伴随着供体标记活性的完全丧失。从突变体中分离的DNA供体-受体复合物缺乏供体标记活性,并非由于第二个受体未摄取该复合物及其无法与第二个受体的染色体结合。因为携带供体原子的受体分子数量高于突触前供体分子长度所能解释的数量,所以我们倾向于这样的观点,即供体DNA原子与突变体染色体的结合是由局部DNA合成而非通过重组进行的供体DNA分散整合导致的。