Park J B, von Recum A F, Gratzick G E
Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs. 1979;7(1):41-53. doi: 10.3109/10731197909119371.
A study on the feasibility of implants pre-coated with an acrylic bone cement has been performed. Four types of implants, an actual canine femoral prosthesis, a polished steel rod (0.49 cm dia. x 13 cm long) with and without pre-coating, and a sandblasted steel rod with pre-coating were implanted into canine femurs in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the interfacial shear strengths in addition to the bench test. After serial sectioning the samples in discs, push-out tests were made to evaluate the interfacial strengths of cement-bone-implant. The weakest interfacial shear strength was exhibited by the polished rod/cement interface (0.5 MPa) while the strongest was the "old" and "new" cement interface (23.4 MPa). The bone/cement interfacial strength was in between for in vitro (1.17 MPa) and in vivo (1.68 MPa). The shear strength of rod/cement interface increased substantially by sandblasting (6.84 MPa). The microscopic observation of the interface showed somewhat smaller gaps developed for the pre-coated rod than the uncoated rod due to the shrinkage effect. In addition to the overall increase in interfacial strength, the pre-coating may furthermore reduce the setting temperature, the shrinkage, and the amount of monomer released during operation due to the reduced amount of cement at the time of implantation. The more gradual transmission of load from implant to bone and "auto-centering" of implants during operation by pre-coating, are believed to be advantageous over conventional cement fixation method.
已开展一项关于用丙烯酸骨水泥预涂植入物可行性的研究。将四种类型的植入物,即实际的犬股骨假体、一根有预涂层和无预涂层的抛光钢棒(直径0.49厘米×长13厘米)以及一根有预涂层的喷砂钢棒,在体外和体内植入犬股骨,以评估界面剪切强度,此外还进行了台架试验。在将样本切成圆盘状进行连续切片后,进行推出试验以评估骨水泥 - 骨 - 植入物的界面强度。抛光棒/骨水泥界面的界面剪切强度最弱(0.5兆帕),而最强的是“旧”和“新”骨水泥界面(23.4兆帕)。体外(1.17兆帕)和体内(1.68兆帕)的骨/骨水泥界面强度介于两者之间。喷砂处理使棒/骨水泥界面的剪切强度大幅提高(6.84兆帕)。界面的显微镜观察表明,由于收缩效应,预涂棒形成的间隙比未涂棒略小。除了界面强度总体提高外,预涂层还可进一步降低凝固温度、收缩率以及手术过程中因植入时骨水泥用量减少而释放的单体量。预涂层在手术过程中使植入物向骨的载荷传递更平缓以及使植入物“自动对中”,据信比传统的骨水泥固定方法更具优势。