• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对霍乱的环境卫生措施实地评估。

Field evaluation of environmental sanitation measures against cholera.

作者信息

Azurin J C, Alvero M

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51(1):19-26.

PMID:4549038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2366240/
Abstract

Data obtained in a controlled field study over 5 years in 4 communities showed that the provision of sanitary facilities for human waste disposal can reduce the incidence of cholera by as much as 68%, while the provision of a safe water supply can decrease it by 73%. Where both toilets and water supplies are provided, the incidence can be reduced by as much as 76%. There was evidence that cholera infection gaining access to communities with these facilities tends to spread less and produce fewer secondary cases than in a community where such facilities are not provided.

摘要

在4个社区进行的一项为期5年的对照实地研究中获得的数据表明,提供用于处理人类排泄物的卫生设施可将霍乱发病率降低多达68%,而提供安全的供水可将其降低73%。如果同时提供厕所和供水,发病率可降低多达76%。有证据表明,与未提供此类设施的社区相比,霍乱感染进入有这些设施的社区后往往传播得更少,产生的二代病例也更少。

相似文献

1
Field evaluation of environmental sanitation measures against cholera.针对霍乱的环境卫生措施实地评估。
Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51(1):19-26.
2
Cost-effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in a stable refugee population at risk for epidemic cholera and in a population with endemic cholera.口服霍乱疫苗在面临霍乱流行风险的稳定难民群体以及霍乱地方性流行群体中的成本效益。
Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(4):343-52.
3
Study on the transmission of E1 Tor cholera during an outbreak in Can-Itom community in the Philippines.菲律宾坎伊托姆社区霍乱弧菌埃尔托生物型疫情期间传播情况的研究
Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(3):413-9.
4
Cholera in Mexico: the paradoxical benefits of the last pandemic.墨西哥的霍乱:上一次大流行带来的矛盾益处。
Int J Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;10(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
5
Quantitative bacterial examination of domestic water supplies in the Lesotho Highlands: water quality, sanitation, and village health.莱索托高地家庭供水的细菌定量检测:水质、卫生设施与村庄健康
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(10):829-36.
6
Water quality and occurrence of water-borne diseases in the Douala 4th District, Cameroon.喀麦隆杜阿拉第四区的水质与水传播疾病的发生情况
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(12):2321-9. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.268.
7
Cholera outbreak in Baghdad in 2007: an epidemiological study.2007 年巴格达霍乱疫情:一项流行病学研究。
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 Jun;16(6):584-9.
8
Availability of safe drinking-water: the answer to cholera outbreak? Nabua, Camarines Sur, Philippines, 2012.安全饮用水的可得性:霍乱疫情的答案?菲律宾南卡马里内斯省纳布亚,2012年
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2015 Aug 27;6(3):12-6. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2015.6.1.005. eCollection 2015 Jul-Sep.
9
The development of a protocol to manage the potential of groundwater contamination from on-site sanitation.制定一项管理现场卫生设施可能造成地下水污染的方案。
Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg. 2000;105:95-8.
10
Descriptive spatial analysis of the cholera epidemic 2008-2009 in Harare, Zimbabwe: a secondary data analysis.2008-2009 年津巴布韦哈拉雷霍乱疫情的描述性空间分析:二次数据分析。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jan;105(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea.改善环境卫生以预防腹泻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 25;1(1):CD013328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013328.pub2.
2
Effectiveness of hygiene kit distribution to reduce cholera transmission in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018: a prospective cohort study.卫生包分发对减少刚果民主共和国东方省 2018 年霍乱传播的效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 14;11(10):e050943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050943.
3
Prevention and control of cholera with household and community water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: A scoping review of current international guidelines.家庭和社区水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施预防和控制霍乱:当前国际指南的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0226549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226549. eCollection 2020.
4
Does Basic Sanitation Prevent Diarrhea? Contextualizing Recent Intervention Trials through a Historical Lens.基本卫生措施能否预防腹泻?从历史角度看近期干预试验的背景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 28;17(1):230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010230.
5
The case-area targeted rapid response strategy to control cholera in Haiti: a four-year implementation study.海地以病例地区为目标的霍乱快速应对策略:一项为期四年的实施研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Apr 16;13(4):e0007263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007263. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
A prospective cohort study comparing household contact and water Vibrio cholerae isolates in households of cholera patients in rural Bangladesh.一项在孟加拉国农村地区比较霍乱患者家庭中接触者和水中霍乱弧菌分离株的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 27;12(7):e0006641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006641. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a latrine intervention in the reduction of childhood diarrhoeal health in Nyando District, Kisumu County, Kenya.肯尼亚基苏木县尼亚永多地区厕所干预措施减少儿童腹泻病效果评估。
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Jul;146(9):1079-1088. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818000924. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Cholera in Cameroon, 2000-2012: Spatial and Temporal Analysis at the Operational (Health District) and Sub Climate Levels.喀麦隆2000 - 2012年霍乱情况:卫生区业务层面和次气候层面的时空分析
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Nov 17;10(11):e0005105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005105. eCollection 2016 Nov.
9
Water supply interruptions and suspected cholera incidence: a time-series regression in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.供水中断与疑似霍乱发病率:刚果民主共和国的时间序列回归分析
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001893. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea.改善水质以预防腹泻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD004794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of improved sanitary facilities on infant diarrhea in a Hopi village.改善卫生设施对霍皮族村庄婴儿腹泻的影响。
Public Health Rep (1896). 1969 Dec;84(12):1093-7.